Here, Here!
I also get bugged by the misplaced "DOS" reference. Additionally, I hate when users refer to any text-based application or interface as "the old DOS program we used to use". I've heard the OS/2 Command Prompt, text-based OS/2 applications, terminal sessions on a mainframe through a telnet app, and even Unix text-based apps all referred to as "DOS".
Well, Jody, You've got a hell of an uphill job on your hands reeducating all us poor uneducated types . Especially as I can see, on a quick and dirty search, over 300 Threads which talk aboiut the "DOS Command Prompt" and the "DOS Command Window".
Really, if you know what someone MEANS by the phrase they use, does it really matter whether they are TECHNICALLY correct. Many of us are not particularly interested in the ins and outs of the architecture of the computers we use or the way that things work on a chip level, we just want to know what button to click to get our fonts changed or our files in an acceptable order.
It's very comparable to the fact that I KNEW what you meant when you said "Here, Here" at the start of your post. The Phrase is actually "Hear, Hear" but you've probably never seen it written down.
However, for someone who is a student of the English Language, the words "Hear", "Here" and "Year" are all pronounced quite differently. But then, I'm pedantic about English.
But, as I knew what you MEANT by the misquoted phrase, I would never normally draw attention to it by correcting you - but on this occasion it does seem to be a good illustration of the fact that we Pedants all have our individual crosses to bear (LOL).
Merlin
Ye're a man after me own heart, Merlin!
Because this is a technical forum, I have to occasionally sit on my hands to keep from correcting some of the more egregious errors made in the English language. But for the most part, sitting on my hands works.
Yep, I caught "Here, Here!" too, as well as a number of other mutilations of English . . . but I digress.
I agree that DOS is no longer what it used to be, but the fact is that in the beginning, Windows 3.0/3.1 was built on top of DOS. I was around when Bill Gates was still in diapers. And, I'm not so sure that the underpinning of Windows 8.1 isn't still tied to a whole lot of DOS. Why else do we have the Command Prompt? If there weren't some DOS down deep in the bowels of Windows, Microsoft would have made a Windows app to cover what we use the Command Prompt for. Chill everyone and take the above with a grain of salt.
I will never try to tell someone they're dead wrong, because if I do, I can guarantee I'll eat my words before long. Neither will I correct someone unless I absolutely know they're fixing to get into trouble. It makes no nevermind to me if someone wants to say there's no longer any DOS in Windows, or if they say it's all DOS underneath. Like you, I understand what they mean. And there's no way someone's gonna get into trouble trying to do something in DOS these days, since the Command Prompt will just sit there and act dumb . . . or tell me I'm dumb.
Just my two cents and that won't even buy a penny piece of candy any more.
My Computer
System One
-
- OS
- Windows 8.1
- Computer type
- PC/Desktop
- System Manufacturer/Model
- HP Pavilion 500-056
- CPU
- AMD Elite Quad-Core A8-6500
- Memory
- 8 GB
- Graphics Card(s)
- AMD Radeon HD 8570D
- Monitor(s) Displays
- Acer 23"
- Screen Resolution
- 1920 X 1080
- Hard Drives
- 1 TB
- Keyboard
- Logitech Wave K350
- Mouse
- Logitech M510
- Internet Speed
- Fast
- Browser
- Firefox
- Antivirus
- Windows Defender