They FINALLY did, and they're FINALLY getting traction in the touch and tablet PC computing space. The larger chunk of new Windows PCs have been touch equipped, for obvious reasons. This is where the Blue wave for Windows expands upon, not the elder traditional UI for the technological rodent, but for the modern touch.
But this article is just more typical moot.
Sounds like paid political announcement from another Alternative Reality Spokesperson, with a snide insult thrown in for good measure.
Windows 8 is getting about as much traction as a car with racing slicks on an ice rink. Also, PCs are not touch equipped, it's the monitors that provide touch functionality and at a considerable overhead compared to traditional monitors, for potentially little gain.
The howls of righteous indignation are simply getting louder every day.
aYup.
After reading these forums the past few weeks, it's honestly hard not to take side. Over at MacRumors, they have equally retarded arguments with each other. No winners at all, just a little honest observation mixed in with 10 tons of meant influence/prejudice. Neither side is worse, but both stink.
I would compare it to the brand-wars on firearm forums, but that would get me banned, according to the rules I unfortunately read by joining here. (sigh)
You guys do know that you're merely defending or supporting public company's, right? Meaning that more shares are owned by the general public than by the company itself. Why not let the markets decide? They will anyhow.
MS has created 'Tiles'. Unfortunately, they want 'Tiles' AND 'Windows' to coexist. (they do not, on a desktop)
One belongs on a tablet, the other does not. Having tried to embrace both at once, it's sorta discombobulated at best.
MS should fix it, and they likely will.