Windows 8 and 8.1 Forums


Microsoft's Surface strategy: As long as it takes

  1. #1


    Posts : 22,576
    64-bit Windows 10

    Microsoft's Surface strategy: As long as it takes


    Next week, Microsoft is expected to launch a Surface Mini, and perhaps another, larger Surface device to add to its tablet PC portfolio. The idea of Surface Mini certainly makes sense; smaller slates are seeing growth, so a seven- or eight-inch model could potentially capitalise on that nicely.

    The arrival of the third-generation of the Surface (perhaps a Surface Pro 3) would also help Microsoft's tablet prospects in another way: it usually takes tech companies three versions of any new device to fix all the flaws spotted in the product.

    The first-gen Surface RT and Surface Pro tablets were released in October 2012 and February 2013 respectively. Their successors, the Surface 2 and Surface Pro 2, arrived in October 2013. But sales remain low, probably somewhere around two to three percent of the worldwide tablet market.

    The numbers Microsoft has released about the Surface tell part of the story. Microsoft reported Surface revenue of $494m in its most recent third quarter report, but the costs associated with generating that revenue (which include manufacturing and distribution of the devices) hit $539m.

    The same thing happened in the previous quarter, covering the three months to December 31 last year: Surface revenues hit $893m, but at a cost of revenue of $932m. In Microsoft's Q1, Surface revenue stood at $400m and the cost of revenue at $645m (before that Microsoft reported Surface revenue of $853m in its Q4 2012 — along with a $900m write-down on Surface RT inventory).

    According to these numbers, Surface is still costing more to make and distribute than Microsoft is making from selling it.

    So how long will can Microsoft continue to build 'tablet PCs' that are snubbed by consumers? The answer is probably as long as it takes.
    Read more at: Microsoft's Surface strategy: As long as it takes | ZDNet

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  2. #2

    Microsoft's money pit: Surface has lost $1.2B


    Computerworld - Microsoft has lost more than $1.2 billion so far on its Surface tablet business, an expensive experiment that makes tomorrow's revelations of new hardware an important milestone for the "devices" side of its corporate-refashioning strategy.

    On Tuesday, CEO Satya Nadella is expected to step on a New York stage and unveil one or more new Surface tablets, and outline his direction for the in-house hardware project birthed by his predecessor, Steve Ballmer.
    More
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  3. #3


    Chicago USA
    Posts : 84
    Windows 7 Pro and Windows 8.1 Pro 32 bit and 64 bit

    Too Expensive


    When I was in the market for a tablet I walked right past both Apple and Microsoft when I saw the price tags. $150 for a Samsung Android 7" device is what I ended up buying. My first tablet and I will be darned if I was going to cough up big money on something I wasn't even sure would be worthwhile.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  4. #4


    Thanks for posting those, mates.

    In perspective, this is pocket change. It is somewhat expected to lose money on a new ball field. It'll eventually come around.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  5. #5


    Posts : 34
    Win7


    Quote Originally Posted by HippsieGypsie View Post
    Thanks for posting those, mates.

    In perspective, this is pocket change. It is somewhat expected to lose money on a new ball field. It'll eventually come around.
    Why do you think that? I don't remember Apple losing money for years with its iPhone and/or iPad..?
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  6. #6


    Posts : 835
    Win 8.1 Pro


    Quote Originally Posted by mick823 View Post
    When I was in the market for a tablet I walked right past both Apple and Microsoft when I saw the price tags. $150 for a Samsung Android 7" device is what I ended up buying. My first tablet and I will be darned if I was going to cough up big money on something I wasn't even sure would be worthwhile.
    that makes your post irrelevant then.
    You didn't bother to find out why they cost what they do.

    Sorry a moped isn't going to give you the experience of a 650cc Motorcycle.

    Riding the monorail isn't going to show you what it's like to ride a roller coaster.

    The Apple prices are what they are cause, they roll the cost of the OS into the hardware cost.
    If they were software only company, their OS price would compare to Windows.
    But, they still overprice their hardware beyond that cause people are willing to pay it.
    The specs don't warrant the prices they charge.
    The Apple Chips are on par with the Nvidia chips used in the Surface RT

    The Surface Pro is actually priced about right for the hardware in the form factor you are getting.
    It's a Laptop class Tablet.

    Surface RT also out classes the rest, and I would suggest it over the others.

    But I guess it doesn't really matter to those where a price tag is all they look at.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  7. #7


    Quote Originally Posted by Rxd View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by HippsieGypsie View Post
    Thanks for posting those, mates.

    In perspective, this is pocket change. It is somewhat expected to lose money on a new ball field. It'll eventually come around.
    Why do you think that? I don't remember Apple losing money for years with its iPhone and/or iPad..?
    Here's part of a post I wrote recently to set a pace.

    Quote Originally Posted by HippsieGypsie View Post
    Now it's time to mention the other two tech giants > Apple and Google. What do they have to offer? Well, Apple makes more profit on hardware than anything else. That seems to be their specialty. Can businesses afford those kinds of prices? Might as well sell jewelry also. Google makes tons of profit on advertising and data tracking. That's their specialty. Businesses need that so far as marketing, but that's about it. Don't forget the integration of Bing in Windows. So what's MS' specialty? Same as it's been all along and what made them the giant they are > Writing software > Cutting edge software > MS Office suite being their mainstay.
    I say that because of history, specialty, location, and fads. The old adage > Do what you do best. MS' specialty is software. Back in the day they were tied to the IBM-architecture PC. PCs were known as business number crunchers. They still are to some degree, but today we use them for all sorts of tasks. Apple and it's architecture was known for graphics color rendering (picture and video) because that architecture was better at that, but, again, today they are used them for all sorts of tasks. Apple has always been an expensive proposition to buy. IBM was based out of New York and Apple out of California. There is a certain stigma about MS being tied to a lower-priced PC. Along with the Steve Jobs guru following and fad of the iProducts, that will be hard to break through. I truly don't mean to cut down iProducts at all, but like I kiddingly tell my relatives and friends that have them that they're overpriced pieces of costume jewelry.

    On the other hand Androids are very inexpensive, but do nothing.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  8. #8


    Hafnarfjörđur IS
    Posts : 4,376
    Linux Centos 7, W8.1, W7, W2K3 Server W10


    Hi there

    Perhaps we should have some Business 101 tutorials in the Forum -- I'm amazed with so many people in the US in particular studying for Business degrees one way or another don't seem to have immersed themselves seriously at "Street Level" into a business to see how it REALLY works. (How many MBA's have we got on this Forum currently !!!!!).

    1) If you don't innovate etc your market will gradually dry up and you wiill eventually go out of business. This costs a certain amount of money but often can be offset against Capital Gains Taxes (look at Pfizer - Viagra is one of its best known products but it needs something new now - trying to buy Astra Zeneca - loads of DECENT research into Cancer, diabetes etc drugs in UK - just because of a benefit of Capital gains tax - 35% in US , 20% in UK --> BBC News - AstraZeneca rejects 'final' takeover bid from Pfizer)

    2) If you are new to a market as Ms obviously is in the case of mobile systems then you have a LOT of catching up to do and it will take time, money, and some re-think of strategy.

    3) Your company is sitting (as a load are these days) on a HUGE cash mountain -- no good leaving it in the Bank at a miserly 0.5% --this is the time companies will try out new strategies etc --even if they have to BORROW money it's at a really rediculous rate.

    4) Gigantic Hedgefunds are out there just LOOKINg for investment potentials -- the amount of CHEAP cash swilling around the markets at the moment makes it a No Brainer for decent companies to try a load of stuff even if at first sight it doesn't appea successful.

    (These rates unfortunately aren't available to individuals who might be saying (rightly so IMO) why am I paying say from 17.5% to 24% depending on your circumstances for a Credit Card when Federal Interest rate is 0.5%. Someone is making Big bucks on that -- unfortunately that'sa topic for a whole different Forum).

    Cheers
    jimbo
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  9. #9


    Posts : 835
    Win 8.1 Pro


    I agree, and yes MS is going to lose money right now, due to being late as they are. But they have a very good product that begs for better advertisement.

    They have to overcome already established markets, not always an easy thing to do. Especially against cheaper technology.

    Their system and hardware are solid, very solid, to state otherwise would be disingenuous.

    They unfortunately need to overcome a stigmatism perpetuated by bad publicity, rampant disinformation and an overzealous change to the GUI.

    I hope they stay on track, and don't get further off track by going fully cloud at all.

    Some cloud is ok, good in fact.

    Yes, people need basic courses in economics 101. It should be a required high school course.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  10. #10


    Sydney, Nova Scotia, Canada
    Posts : 6,490
    Windows 10 Education 64 Bit


    I wouldn't mind having one but at that price it was "full size laptop" or "Surface Tablet". At the time I didn't have either and couldn't afford both. I bought the full sized laptop. That fit in better with what I wanted and needed. I'd still like to have a surface but just can't justify spending that kind of money a second time. Not on my present income. I'm sure you get what you pay for but not everybody wants to spend that kind of money on something with a 10" screen. I'd also love to own an Aston Martin DB9 but don't have that kind of cash either. If I win the lotto maybe both.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Microsoft's Surface strategy: As long as it takes
Related Threads
When I reboot Windows I get the login after approx 10 sec. But after I login it takes approx 25 sec for the network connection to get airborne --- first a red cross and then yellow triangle. Where is the bottleneck ? I have a fast Intel NIC and my LAN runs at 1 GBits and the Internet speed is...
Backup Strategy For Surface in Performance & Maintenance
I know Microsoft has its built in backup tools such as File History but given that the hard drive of my Surface Pro is 128gb I think its good to make a full drive backup. There are many free tools notably Paragon and Macrium but afaik they do not have cloud backup, They probably do but after a...
Hello everyone, The attached video will NOT win the Youtube film of the year award, however, I hope that someone might be able to help. My Dell XPS8700 is like a 16 year old, friendly one minute and totally nuts the next for no reason at all! The computer DOES boot, but there's no beep and...
Windows 8 takes too long to boot in Performance & Maintenance
I bought my Dell desktop about 3 years ago. Since then I replaced the HDD with a new Samsung SSD and reinstalled Windows 8 on it. After that it started running really fast. I usually don't reboot it too often, I do it maybe once a month after installing updates. What I've been noticing lately...
Photos app takes too long! in Software and Apps
Hey all, After a clean install of Windows 8 Pro and upgrading to 8.1 Pro immediately after, I noticed that the Photos app takes a very long time to load a photo that I opened from the Desktop. When double clicking a picture from the Desktop, the Photos app splash screen comes up and stays like...
Windows 8 takes too long to shutdown. in Performance & Maintenance
Windows 8 which I installed recently (from factory recovery image) suddenly now takes too long to shutdown. Around 2 minutes and 20 seconds. I tried disabling and enabling "Fast Startup" but that didn't affect the shutdown time. Also reduced the "WaitToKillServiceTimeout" from 5000ms to 3000ms...
Eight Forums Android App Eight Forums IOS App Follow us on Facebook