Windows 8 and 8.1 Forums


Intel 'preparing' to put an end to user-replaceable CPUs

  1. #11


    Posts : 142
    Windows 8 Enterprise 64-bit (7 Ult, Vista & XP in V-Box)


    Quote Originally Posted by alphanumeric View Post
    This is not good!

    Understatement of the decade... :-(

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  2. #12


    Posts : 835
    Win 8.1 Pro


    Umm,, Hello, is anyone there?????

    Windows OEM installs are locked to the motherboard,,, have a nice day.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  3. #13


    Orbiting the Moon
    Posts : 2,975
    Windows 10 x64



    What is this joke...
    Soldered CPU's on desktops!

    What's next, CPU implants?

    I'll consider buying LESS hardware from now on...
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  4. #14


    Posts : 142
    Windows 8 Enterprise 64-bit (7 Ult, Vista & XP in V-Box)


    Quote Originally Posted by Tepid View Post
    Umm,, Hello, is anyone there?????

    Windows OEM installs are locked to the motherboard,,, have a nice day.

    I know.

    And I'm not...

    IMO, it should NOT be legal to do this.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  5. #15


    Orbiting the Moon
    Posts : 2,975
    Windows 10 x64


    Quote Originally Posted by Tepid View Post
    Umm,, Hello, is anyone there?????

    Windows OEM installs are locked to the motherboard,,, have a nice day.
    That's probably the main reason it's cheaper than previous versions!
    ...because you'll have to buy more of 'em...
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  6. #16


    Posts : 5,707
    Windows 8.1 Pro


    You know, this sounds kind of bad, but I have to think what if the OEMs like ASUS and others will still offer aftermarket motherboards? I mean, how OFTEN do CPUs explode these days that requires replacing? Sure, you can argue that it prevents simple upgrading, but we're living in an era where technology shifts literally every 6-12 months. Intel has new and different sockets pretty constantly, AMD does too, except they try to make the effort to take advantage of a new socket type for a while; just take a look at AM3+. FM1 is an exception, but they will be making a new APU for the FM2 socket for at least another generation or two of APUs.

    Then take a look at how LONG we keep our hardware. Some here have had their i7s since they first came to the market and don't need to upgrade anytime soon. Really, the needed upgrade for PCs generally will be RAM or video cards than anything. So theoretically, if that person that rebuilt their system when the i7 first came out, and rebuild in a few years from now, they WILL HAVE to buy a new motherboard, new CPU, and possibly new DDR4 RAM; maybe a new PSU or video card(s) regardless. With a CPU soldered on board, it just eliminates a step of installation and possibly might filter down some CPU options that are getting to the point of being superfluous. How many different i3, i5, and i7 versions are there right now? Quite a bit.

    It might just make upgrading more easier. Although, OEMs and Intel, and AMD, need to play nice in offering decent options though. Intel can't take full control of things nor AMD. It's kind of with GPUs, NVIDIA and AMD both make the dies and cards, but they also sell the dies to OEMs manufacturers to build better enclosures, heatsinks, and tweak around with settings to take full advantage of the chip. You don't upgrade the GPU chip on a video card, you upgrade the whole thing to a new one when it's not powering things well enough. Same goes with puter systems, you can't always upgrade the CPU on an older motherboard and expect great gains, you swap out for new parts.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  7. #17


    Posts : 5,360
    7/8/ubuntu/Linux Deepin


    Simple .

    Buy AMD.

    Intel will pay attention to that.

    We aren't the oem's - but if all upgraders/modders shun intel - they will get the message.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  8. #18


    Posts : 39
    Windows 8 Pro x64


    Quote Originally Posted by Brink View Post


    Traditionally, the processors in desktop systems are fitted into a socket on the motherboard that allows them to be removed and replaced, while systems such as notebooks and tablets have the CPU soldered onto the motherboard.


    Read more at source:
    Intel 'preparing' to put an end to user-replaceable CPUs | ZDNet

    This is not exactly true, there are many laptops out there that have sockets for cpu's. I have personally owned a few and upgraded them, its not hard to do. In fact, the laptop i'm using right now I've upgraded. You just find out what socket type your laptop has and then buy an intel or Amd processor with the same socket type or number. I'm not saying all laptops have sockets, so if your looking to buy a laptop that you can upgrade or replace the cpu make sure you do your research first so you know what your getting. Socket type cpu's are good because if one fails, then you can replace it yourself and not worry about the whole laptop not being no good anymore.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  9. #19


    Tropical Island Pair a Dice
    Posts : 3,030
    Windows 8.1 Pro x64/ Windows 7 Ult x64


    Not good, not good at all.

    If Intel goes this route, others will move to fill the gap, AMD and maybe some new companies.
    I would not buy anything with Intel products if they start to move in this direction.
    This proves that good competition is always best.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  10. #20


    I mean I can understand pairing the motherboard Intel feels will best show off their own product but I feel this takes away the point of being able to pick your own parts. I'm not a computer custom builder but if I ever was I would want to choose ever part that I can. I don't want things that don't need to be put together, together. Doesn't even matter if you won't upgrade or you if you will, we should have a choice to choose. I don't get these companies trying to force us to play their game. The whole point of customizing your pc is to choose your own parts. I don't even care if I had to change next year, I don't want parts that I don't like stuck together with a part I do like. It's one thing if they approved which motherboards wouldn't break their processors but this is just crazy.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Intel 'preparing' to put an end to user-replaceable CPUs
Related Threads
I have a Dell Precision 690 with Dual Zenon 3.0 processors running Windows 8.1 Pro X86. CPU on the Performance tab only shows a single processor. I have the identical computer running Windows 7 Pro X64 and it Task Manager/Performance tab show2s two processors. I've read of other people having...
Preparing a new HDD for use in Drivers & Hardware
Hello all, I must replace the HDD in a laptop because the old one is corrupted. I am doing this for a friend. I have: a laptop I am using, which has a download of Windows 8 on it; a new HDD; a caddy. However, I'm not sure how to link the pieces.
Read more at: Intel introduces nine new Core i5, Core i7 Haswell mobile processors | ZDNet and Intel refreshes Core i5 and Core i7 mobile lineups
Hello, I dont really know where to put this question, but I guess here is the place. I recently got a new computer, and I want to change the CPU on it, just so I can do more things in Windows. I want a quad core, but I am dubious any will fit on my motherboard. Right now, there is an AMD E1 1500...
Source A Guy
Built a Quad AMD interlagos machine with four physical cpu's. Win8 not seeing it correctly. In Device manager I count 64 cpu's which is correct but in task manager it only shows that it is seeing 2 physical cpu's but 48 logical processors? then I turned on HyperV service and now it shows 48...
Eight Forums Android App Eight Forums IOS App Follow us on Facebook