- Messages
- 71
I did have three ideas, but have forgotten them all. Hmmmm. That is really annoying!
Use less resources(ram/video card memory) and be able to run on slower computers all the while having a new user interface.
In regards to 128 bit support. I highly doubt we will see it in that form. Besides x64 is just not becoming mainstream it will take a few more years before they will even consider it....
I can only see a use for 128 bit once our current "main stream" processors have 4-6 cores and our "power user" processors rate 6-12 cores.What would be the advantage of 128-bit? Seeing as processors today use an address space of 48 or so...
I can only see a use for 128 bit once our current "main stream" processors have 4-6 cores and our "power user" processors rate 6-12 cores.
Or Ms could force a 64 bit transition by not releasing an x86 build. yes its highly unlikely, but in the end they(MS) have the power to develop in any way they find necessary or in their favor.I agree. We do not make use of 64 bit enough. Not to mention 64 Bit cannot emulate 16 bit. With that in mind 128 bit more thank likely couldnt handle 32 bit. Which at this current point in time about half current applications still only come in 32 bit .
Quick question, would you rather have directories, or have all of your individual files an the root of the hdd/sdd? Think how "ORGANIZED" your life would be without directoriesLooking through a directory? That just seems to waste more time the search feature is great but other than that the list of programs is kind eh and they waste a button to be used for shortcuts as a windows button.
A whole new user interface. The start menu should be eliminated so should the start button on the keyboard it's one less option for shortcut key.