What's new

Solved Bored with Metro already and other thoughts

slowhand818

Member
Member
OK this is only my opinion, so you are fully entitled to disagree with me, and of course many of you will.

So to history lesson. I had to fight tooth and nail to get Windows eight working on a high end i7 with 16 Gb of RAM. I had to reinstall several times and have been up many nights until the early hours of the morning to get it to work. I am also a very experienced high end user for at least 20 years, not a newbie. Why the lesson? Some people on this forum attack anyone who posts anything negative about Windows 8 as being an idiot who knows nothing about computers.
So you might not like what I say but I do know what I am talking about. Why so sensitive? well I like many others joined this forum for sharing opinions and gaining help. But several users in this forum have no constructive way of disagreeing with what you say other than personally attacking you. I don't mind the fact that people disagree with what I say. The reason for posting posts like this is specifically to generate debate. I am just getting tired of seeing so much personal abuse on this forum. It is very sad.

Right down to it. I have been running windows 8 for a while now and here are my conclusions.

1) Despite what some users say I still think making safe mode primarily available from within Windows a very poor decision. The main time anyone accesses Safe mode is when they cant start windows. I like many others have added safe mode to the boot options, to at least make this possible. Yes the new safe mode menu is much better and accessing it from within windows is very easy but its a different story if you can not boot into windows. Similarly not having the ability to reinstall windows whilst maintaining your installed apps is a backward move.

2) I know people with a few apps are managing without the start menu by turning their taskbar into a MAC clone. I have way too many apps loaded for that to be practical. So in order to keep Windows eight on my machine, I have had no choice but to use a third party start menu. I think it would have been more sensible to make the task bar optional rather than remove it. Microsoft's marketing allegedly found few users who use the task bar. Umm then why are this forum and others full of people asking how to put it back?

3) Despite the effort that has gone into Metro, Within two days I have probably downloaded 95% of all the apps I am ever going to download. Whilst it is useful to have my laptop working more like my phone, l see no place for it on my main work pc.
The apps are also pretty superficial and I am becoming really annoyed by the metro loading screens for the apps. What was the point of making windows boot quickly if you loose any advantage when you start an app. I now find I am hardly ever using them, and tend to jump quickly into the standard desktop. I would say I am easily spending most of my time away from Metro in the desktop.

4) I don't really miss Aero, at first I did but now, not so much. The real deal breaker for Metro is having the icons dominate the screen. Everyone in the office including me have individual desktop images, and nearly everyone uses the slide show to show multiple images. What I here you cry... that is still in Windows 8. Yes it is but its in the desktop and so you naturally work in the desktop. We all strive for our screens to look individual, and Metro severely limits this. Granted you will have different tiles in different places but they look the same! I just find Metro so boring to look at and sadly after a few weeks boring to use.

5) Everything that runs on windows 7 will run on windows 8. That's just incorrect. You cant rely on the upgrade advisor or the compatibility centre. Applications are shown as compatible which are not.

6) use of windows 8 on a non touch screen is much easier in desktop than Metro, and it almost forces you out of Metro. It works, but only just. Its certainly not ergonomic or enjoyable.

So in summary using it on my laptop is ok and I certainly wont be uninstalling it. As for all of the desktop PCs we own, well they are staying in Windows seven. Any performance gains you get from windows 8 are squandered in the clunky interface.

Will the launch succeed? Not sure. Most of our pc suppliers allow us to pick which operating system we want installed so there is no immediate need to jump to 8. The consumer market is different new pcs tend to come preloaded. However the current financial climate is not really suited to people refreshing their pcs to any great extent.

Will it be as bad as vista? Probably not, Microsoft are certainly spending much more on the marketing for eight than vista. We are all struggling to get that blasted song out of our heads anyways.

Will they grab a big chunk of the tablet market. Umm probably not people prefer Android and Iphone and visually they leave the windows eight surface for dead. It will sell, but not in the numbers it needs to.

So I now have Windows eight an 7. The world did not end, but neither did it become a much better place to be. I initially hated it, but now I have warmed to it. But the only way I could get my laptop working the way I wanted was to restore basic windows functionality. Both Integrate really well so I can easily move data between the two. But what happens if Microsoft jump completely into Metro and drop the desktop functionality................well then the 3d animation industry for one will be telling them very firmly that you cant run our applications on a mobile phone.

You can attack me all you want, but the content of the forum, is clear to see. Yes the visits to forum going down is probably due to many overcoming their installation issues which is good for windows 8. Yes people who use their laptops or pc's for recreational use really like windows 8. But those of us with deadlines to meet, and major apps to run. Metro gives us very little and for now on Desktops Windows7 is a better choice.

I applaud Microsoft for trying to do something different, but I think the jump to touch screen is too early, and will ultimately prove to be like the market for 3d TV's.....no where near as big as first predicted.


Ah well best take my position on the stake and prepare to get burned!
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    windows 8 prof 64 bit

Kat

Banned
Probably one of the more sensible posts I've read.

You state your case well, and see no need to denigrate or abuse those who differ.

Most of us aren't 'attack dogs' but some of us, both pro and con, do sometimes get carried away somewhat.

Quick tip: Whack Classic Start onto Win 8, set it to boot to the desktop, and you'll swear you're in a turbo-charged win 7.

There is NO need to go to the tile screen unless you CHOOSE to.

That's what I run, but I have the tile screen enabled, cos I use both it and the 'old' start orb.

Best of both worlds, methinks....
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Windows 8 Enterprise 64-bit (7 Ult, Vista & XP in V-Box)
    System Manufacturer/Model
    Acer Aspire Ethos AS8951G 'Super-Laptop'.
    CPU
    Intel Sandy-Bridge i7-2670QM quad-core
    Motherboard
    Acer
    Memory
    8GB DDR3
    Graphics Card(s)
    Intel 3000HD / Ge-Force GT555M 2 gigs
    Sound Card
    Realtek/5.1 Dolby built-in including speakers.
    Monitor(s) Displays
    18.4" full-HD
    Screen Resolution
    1920x1024
    Hard Drives
    2x750GB Toshiba internal, 1x500GB Seagate external, 1x2TB Seagate external, 1x640GB Toshiba pocket-drive, 1x640GB Samsung pocket drive.
    PSU
    Stock
    Case
    Laptop
    Cooling
    Air-cooled
    Mouse
    I/R cordless.
    Internet Speed
    Borderline pathetic.

HippsieGypsie

It's Gururrrrrr8!
Lol! Heretic! Burn him at the stake! :p

All kidding aside -> You probably read the thread the other day of the new member that posted his opinion in his first post. My God they crucified the poor fellow! I responded the best I could. I could've done better I'm sure. Sorry to say it seems he's gone now.

Everyone is certainly entitled to their observations and opinion. We are all individuals who cast our own realities. I think the world would be very boring if we all thought the same.

Make the cake whatever flavor you want. It's your cake. Your the one that has to eat it. :)

It's good you posted. Thank you! I took out of it what I thought I needed and left the rest.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    8.1 Pro X64
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
    System Manufacturer/Model
    Acer T690
    CPU
    Intel Pentium D Dual Core
    Motherboard
    Acer/Intel E946GZ
    Memory
    2GB (max upgrade)
    Graphics Card(s)
    Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 3000 - PCI Express x16
    Sound Card
    Integrated RealTek ALC888 high-definition audio with 7.1 channel audio support
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Acer AL1917W A LCD
    Screen Resolution
    1440 X 900
    Hard Drives
    350 GB Seagate Barracuda 7200.10
    Thumb drives
    PSU
    Standard 250 watt
    Case
    Desktop 7.2" (183mm) W x 17.5" (445mm) L x 14.5"
    Cooling
    Dual case fans + CPU fan
    Keyboard
    Acer Windows PS/2
    Mouse
    Wireless Microsoft Arc
    Internet Speed
    54mbp/s
    Browser
    IE11
    Antivirus
    Defender
    Other Info
    Office Pro 2013 / Nokia Lumia 1520 Windows Phone 8.1DP GDR1

area 66

Banned
OK this is only my opinion, so you are fully entitled to disagree with me, and of course many of you will.


don't forget Microsoft can't do wrong
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Windows 8 enterprise x64
    System Manufacturer/Model
    Pc-Quebec / Area 66
    CPU
    i7-3960X Extreme Edition
    Motherboard
    Rampage IV Extreme
    Memory
    Gskill 4x4 GB
    Graphics Card(s)
    4 x HD 7970
    Sound Card
    onboard
    Screen Resolution
    2560*1600
    Hard Drives
    C:\Intel series 520 SSD , 250 GB
    D:\ WD 750 black with Intel 40gb SSD cache Intel RST
    E:\ WD 2TB Black
    PSU
    Corsair AX 1200
    Case
    TT Mozart TX
    Cooling
    Water Cooled
    Keyboard
    Logitech G-15
    Other Info
    Windows 8 VM is install on his own SSD.

Colonel Travis

New Member
Power User
The only criticism in slowhand818's post that I haven't read much about is the Safe Mode part. Otherwise, it's exactly what critics have been saying all year. Problem is, the critics of the critics have been ignoring it.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Black Label 7x64
    CPU
    AMD Phenom II X6 1055t
    Motherboard
    GA-890FXA-UD5
    Memory
    8GB
    Graphics Card(s)
    Radeon HD 6790
    Sound Card
    X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Acer AJ15
    Screen Resolution
    1600x900
    Hard Drives
    Barracuda 7200 SATA 280GB
    WD Caviar Green SATA 500GB
    PSU
    OCZ ModXStream 700W
    Internet Speed
    25 Mbps/25 Mbps

ARC1020

New Member
Power User
I'm one of those who actually prefer the new start page now that I've had time to play with it and get it to my liking. I agree that it wouldn't have done much harm to let people have the option of the traditional Start Menu though, even if it was only in the way of a registry edit.

It's worth noting though you don't have to use Metro "Apps" if you don't want to and you can just use the Metro screen as a start menu to launch desktop software (just like with the traditional Start Menu). This is what I do, although I still have the Metro apps installed and occasionally use the weather/news apps. If you look at the folder structure of the Start Menu, it's essentially just the same as the old start menu, I.E. just a bunch of shortcuts. Here's a screenshot of my Start Menu, which works for me and I find it a lot better to use than the old traditional Start Menu:

2j164hk.jpg

I agree with you about the boot in safe mode though, as I found out the hard way that it wasn't available. I was experimenting with different drivers and well, you can guess what happened next it wouldn't boot, just BSOD everytime I tried. To make it worse, neither refresh or reset would work either, presumably because the drive was encrypted. It wasn't a problem as I had backups, but I only had one available option and that was to re-install windows from scratch using a disc.

As for customising the Metro screen appearance, I've not tried it myself, but it can be done because I've seen it done. Have a look at the following link.
Pimp My Desktop Part 33 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Win 8 64-bit

area 66

Banned
ARC1020 , If I look at your start page, you can even reduce the amount of tiles, Shutdown and Restart can be achieve with crt+alt+del or alt + F4 ' resource is also available on the task bar , many thing like Excel, Word, PhotoShop, I place them on my task bar, so finally only 4 or 6 tiles will need to be access from the old start menu

all that to say, the lost of the old start menu is not a big deal
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Windows 8 enterprise x64
    System Manufacturer/Model
    Pc-Quebec / Area 66
    CPU
    i7-3960X Extreme Edition
    Motherboard
    Rampage IV Extreme
    Memory
    Gskill 4x4 GB
    Graphics Card(s)
    4 x HD 7970
    Sound Card
    onboard
    Screen Resolution
    2560*1600
    Hard Drives
    C:\Intel series 520 SSD , 250 GB
    D:\ WD 750 black with Intel 40gb SSD cache Intel RST
    E:\ WD 2TB Black
    PSU
    Corsair AX 1200
    Case
    TT Mozart TX
    Cooling
    Water Cooled
    Keyboard
    Logitech G-15
    Other Info
    Windows 8 VM is install on his own SSD.

mart4494

New Member
Member
Ah well best take my position on the stake and prepare to get burned!

Very constructive post - thank you. And nope, no one is going to get burned at any stake!!!

The problem with Win8 is that it has managed to unnecessarily polarize opinions about the UI. In doing so many are simply judging the OS based on this alone both in this forum and of course the media. I've installed Win8 RP on my laptop (separate partition) and whilst everything works (or appears to) there are simply no benefits to me. We all work differently and therefore have differing requirements from our desktop/laptops or what have you. So what is meat for one is poison for the other.

Whether the plan of MS is to try and force folks to pay for apps and/or cloud computing is pure guesswork. What is sad though is that the polarizing of opinions could easily have been avoided if an option to use the classic UI had been made available at installation time. Surely with all the resources at the disposal of MS that could have been possible.

Certainly there has been a great deal of debate over the Win8 UI round here, sometimes a bit heated. It would had been preferable if there could have been more discussion(s) over what is going on under the hood rather than Metro.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Win7 & 8 64bit / Linux Mint 14
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
    CPU
    i5 2400
    Motherboard
    Gigabyte
    Memory
    8GB
    Graphics Card(s)
    ATI HD3870
    Sound Card
    On-board
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Asus
    Screen Resolution
    1920x1280
    Hard Drives
    128gb SSD, 500gb SATA
    PSU
    Coolermaster
    Case
    Zalman Z7
    Cooling
    Air
    Keyboard
    Logitech Illuminated wired
    Mouse
    MS Optical wireless
    Antivirus
    Avast

mdmd

Closed as requested
I had to fight tooth and nail to get Windows eight working on a high end i7 with 16 Gb of RAM. .... The reason for posting posts like this is specifically to generate debate.

ok. The upgrade process is flawed. I think one future could be embedded Operating Systems. All this upgrading from one version to the next is problematic. For many, it is a good idea to get a new machine that has the latest OS pre installed thereby eliminating the time wasted to zero.
To your point about installation woes, not everyone has had a problem.

For safe mode, I prefer the new approach. Never cared much for scrambling to press the correct key at the precise moment to get there. Getting to safe mode should be a rare occasion and a bootable disk is a must have item when using a Microsoft product.

I know people with a few apps are managing without the start menu by turning their taskbar into a MAC clone. I have way too many apps loaded for that to be practical. So in order to keep Windows eight on my machine, I have had no choice but to use a third party start menu.

Start menus are fine and useful if that is what you like. I would disagree that the UI cannot handle a mega number of app installs. There is another bloke around here that uses something like 18 partitions (virtual or otherwise) and professes a need for a menuing heirarchy. In this case, an add on to manage an extravagant system configuration is warranted but not necessarily needed. The Windows 8 apps area can handle far more application installs than a menuing system. Also, if one understands the semantic zooming feature of the apps area, NO scrolling is required. One should not confuse the start screen with the apps area.

The apps are also pretty superficial and I am becoming really annoyed by the metro loading screens for the apps.

Opinions Vary.

We all strive for our screens to look individual, and Metro severely limits this. Granted you will have different tiles in different places but they look the same! I just find Metro so boring to look at and sadly after a few weeks boring to use.

Where have you been? IMO, new stuff is emerging all the time. My metro start screen (not the desktop) (my desktop has an RSS Dynamic feed and is also changing all the time) has shuffling wallpapers that change every 15 minutes or so and differing tile colors. Now there is an app to create customizable tiles to desktop shortcuts. So you don't like it. That's ok too.
I would never use Windows 7 now that 8 is available.

You can't rely on the upgrade advisor or the compatibility centre.

True. There are too many variables with this type of process. I think the upgrade advisor is a flawed concept.

use of windows 8 on a non touch screen is much easier in desktop than Metro, and it almost forces you out of Metro. It works, but only just. Its certainly not ergonomic or enjoyable.

Well ok. You don't like it much. IMO, have to disagree with you here. I find it to be eminently easy to use, very ergonomic and enjoyable. Not only do the mouse and keyboard have equal functional status (IMO)(in any 8 scenario), but there are new touch devices made available all the time now. There is no need to touch an erect desktop monitor. Touch can be used on a flat surface (touch mice and touch pads - not laptop pads). No wrist moving, clicking or arm lifting is needed.

You are bored with metro...interesting, I was using a dock launcher in Windows 7 that had explosive fire bombs and ripples of water that ejected smoke when clicking an icon. That became boring also.
 
Last edited:

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Server 2012 / 8.0
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
    System Manufacturer/Model
    Home Built
    CPU
    Intel i7 QuadCore 3770k
    Motherboard
    Asrock Extreme 4
    Memory
    16GB Crucial Ballistix
    Graphics Card(s)
    intel embedded gpu
    Sound Card
    Sound Blaster Z
    Monitor(s) Displays
    AOC / Westinghouse
    Screen Resolution
    1920x1080
    Hard Drives
    Plextor pcie msata
    PSU
    Rosewill Silent Night 500W Fanless / PicoPSU
    Case
    open bench - no case enclosure
    Cooling
    Silverstone HEO2 Passive Silent
    Keyboard
    logitech washable K310
    Mouse
    logitech wired
    Browser
    ie / maxthon
    Other Info
    Totally silent. No fans at all.

slowhand818

Member
Member
Luckily most of the problem apps have recently been patched or updated, its just the pain of having to fork out for new releases of apps you bought only a while ago. Norton Ghost is certainly one that does not work and Norton are refusing point blank to update. Bizarrely most of the apps I have had trouble with came from Microsoft. I couldn't get Office 2007 to install properly , it refused to activate, until I was told of the way to edit the registry before it would activate. I had similar issues with Autodesk product installation. We also have several plugin based programs we use that still use dx9 at the core and the only way I have been able to get them to run is using xp compatibility. They work but they aren't using my graphics cards efficiently. Similar problems with old dx9 games I used to play on Windows 7 with no problem. I also use DX11 games too. As soon as anyone creates DX11 equivalents I will be happy to switch. I am on the relevant game forums and no one has a better solution than running in xp or vista compatibility. In theory I should be able to run them in Windows 7 compatibility as they worked under that. It appears to make no difference from just running it in Windows 8. it must do, but its not allowing the apps to run. I have had to replace Norton with Paragon backup with the added bonus of it being free. I had similar problems with Norton anti virus and ghost when I first switched to Windows 7. Needless to say I wont be renewing our subscriptions with Norton next year.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    windows 8 prof 64 bit

slowhand818

Member
Member
Thanks MDMD yes some people find it easy to use Metro on a PC, I am disabled so that probably does not help. I am glad you like it the more that do the better for Microsoft. As I said I like it on my laptop and enjoy using it. My nervousnous in putting it on our main pcs probably stems from the bad experience we had being early adopters of Windows seven, so I freely admit I am biased on that one. Although the first week was hell I had to reinstall four times before I worked out that there are just some app data folders you don't add privileges to. I am up and running far sooner than I was with Windows 7. I just feel that with so much emphasis being put on Metro, there are a big chunk of users who will wonder what was all the fuss about. Anyway I really have to get some work done. Crashed render farm to sort out. Take care all.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    windows 8 prof 64 bit

mdmd

Closed as requested
Hello slowhand818. Welcome to the Eight Forums.

I am also disabled and retired. :lock:

The DVD player I use > MPC classic < requires an older version of Direct X to run.
For older gaming... wondering if a re - download of direct X older versions from Microsoft would help.
Download DirectX End-User Runtime from Official Microsoft Download Center

Also, Acronis would not work until upgraded to the version compatible with 8.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Server 2012 / 8.0
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
    System Manufacturer/Model
    Home Built
    CPU
    Intel i7 QuadCore 3770k
    Motherboard
    Asrock Extreme 4
    Memory
    16GB Crucial Ballistix
    Graphics Card(s)
    intel embedded gpu
    Sound Card
    Sound Blaster Z
    Monitor(s) Displays
    AOC / Westinghouse
    Screen Resolution
    1920x1080
    Hard Drives
    Plextor pcie msata
    PSU
    Rosewill Silent Night 500W Fanless / PicoPSU
    Case
    open bench - no case enclosure
    Cooling
    Silverstone HEO2 Passive Silent
    Keyboard
    logitech washable K310
    Mouse
    logitech wired
    Browser
    ie / maxthon
    Other Info
    Totally silent. No fans at all.

Metalmania31

Member
Member
Your argument is well put, but I still don't get why people are thinking they must use metro to any great degree. I treat it like the start menu of yore. I access it to start programs I don't always use. Frequently used programs are pinned to taskbar or docked to object dock. As for shutting down that's one area I really think MS screwed the pooch. I created shortcuts on the desktop to reboot and shutdown.

As to Norton that's strange as I have norton business from our ISP Comast and I have it across multiple OS'es in our family win7 32 and 64 bit and now win8 64 bit and norton runs fine on all of them.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Win8.1 Pro 64bit
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
    System Manufacturer/Model
    Custom Build
    CPU
    Intel Core I5 3570K 3.4Ghz w/ Zalman CNPS9900NT RT
    Motherboard
    MSI Z77A-G45 Gaming
    Memory
    G.Skill F3-12800CL9D-8GbXL ; 4Gx2
    Graphics Card(s)
    EVGA GTX 770 Superclocked
    Sound Card
    Creative Sound Blaster Z
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Dual ViewSonic VX2770Smh-LED Black 27" IPS-Panel
    Screen Resolution
    1920x1080
    Hard Drives
    Intel 730 Series SSD 240GBx2 RAID0 Win8.1Pro 6GB/s Sata III
    Intel 320 Series SSD 600GBx2 RAID0 Games 3GB/s Sata II
    Kingston Hyper X 240GB SSD Itunes Drive 6GB/s Sata III
    Western Digital Scorpio Black 1TB - Docked via Esata
    PSU
    Cooler Master GX 750W
    Case
    Corsair Vengence C70
    Cooling
    120mm, 140mm.
    Keyboard
    Corsair Vengence K70
    Mouse
    Logitech G500 Laser
    Internet Speed
    Generally 50/Mbps+
    Browser
    Firefox, Chrome, IE
    Other Info
    Samsung Bluray Optical Drive
    WD 1tb storage backup with Thermatake dock
    Sennheiser 558 Headphones
    Swan M50W 2.1 speakers
    Netgear WNDR4500

Hopachi

Polyhedric Stellation
VIP Member
Pro User
About the OP:

Great post and I kinda agree with some options.

Well... apps, apps... I just don't use any for the moment.

Just using my Win7 programs and luckily no incompatibilities so far.:)
Yes Ivy Bridge pc here also had some issues in begin and still has some others.:(

Why I use Win8? because it was preinstalled (LOL) NO there are features I do like:
-The new compatibility mode
-Hybrid boot
-No transparency (this is irrelevant, we still get that on the taskbar:sick:)
-some minor changes and new services, driver events...
-ISO mounting is built-in.

Start Menu: gets the job done! I like it so far...
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Windows 10 x64
    Computer type
    Laptop
    System Manufacturer/Model
    HP Envy DV6 7250
    CPU
    Intel i7-3630QM
    Motherboard
    HP, Intel HM77 Express Chipset
    Memory
    16GB
    Graphics Card(s)
    Intel HD4000 + Nvidia Geforce 630M
    Sound Card
    IDT HD Audio
    Monitor(s) Displays
    15.6' built-in + Samsung S22D300 + 17.3' LG Phillips
    Screen Resolution
    multiple resolutions
    Hard Drives
    Samsung SSD 250GB + Hitachi HDD 750GB
    PSU
    120W adapter
    Case
    small
    Cooling
    laptop cooling pad
    Keyboard
    Backlit built-in + big one in USB
    Mouse
    SteelSeries Sensei
    Internet Speed
    slow and steady
    Browser
    Chromium, Pale Moon, Firefox Developer Edition
    Antivirus
    Windows Defender
    Other Info
    That's basically it.

Mystere

Power User
VIP Member
Power User
So to history lesson. I had to fight tooth and nail to get Windows eight working on a high end i7 with 16 Gb of RAM. I had to reinstall several times and have been up many nights until the early hours of the morning to get it to work. I am also a very experienced high end user for at least 20 years, not a newbie. Why the lesson? Some people on this forum attack anyone who posts anything negative about Windows 8 as being an idiot who knows nothing about computers.

I see you have an i7 laptop, from an offbrand manufacturer. Chances are this is just a rebadged OEM bare-bones laptop from Intel or Asus. I can't even see any real technical support on their website, so not sure where you would get the correct drivers.

Not saying that that should be a problem, it shouldn't. But, laptop systems sometimes are deliberately setup to require that you get special drivers from the vendor. I know many of NVidia's mobile chipsets are not supported by their mainstream drivers (at least not without hacking the .inf files).

I also have a high end i7 machine, but mine is a desktop rig. I had very few problems, other than issues with the NVidia driver that were solved by installing the WHQL driver.

In any event. Most people that have problems have them because they do an Upgrade install. I am the first to admit that Microsoft does a terrible job with Upgrade installs, and I personally do not believe Microsoft should offer them. It's impossible for them to test every possible upgrade scenario. Best practice is to do a clean install. Yes, you have to reinstall all your apps. You don't lose any data. But if you have any trouble with the upgrade, you will spend far less time and have far less pain and suffering if you had just done a clean install.

So you might not like what I say but I do know what I am talking about. Why so sensitive? well I like many others joined this forum for sharing opinions and gaining help. But several users in this forum have no constructive way of disagreeing with what you say other than personally attacking you. I don't mind the fact that people disagree with what I say. The reason for posting posts like this is specifically to generate debate. I am just getting tired of seeing so much personal abuse on this forum. It is very sad.

Both sides have fault in these discussions. Typically, the posts that start off these long threads are hateful, arrogant, and make claims that are either just not true or are opinion masquerading as fact. The other side tries to correct the misinformation, and argument ensues and tempers flare. If the anti-8 side didn't keep trying to justify their personal opinions with things that aren't true, then things would be totally different.

I can't argue with your personal opinion. I can't argue if you just don't like the way it looks, or how it acts. That's personal choice. But so many feel the need to make claims like "Impossible to use with a keyboard and mouse" or "a touch screen OS" which simply aren't true. You don't like it, fine. Don't make things up to justify your personal taste, though. (not saying you are doing this, just talking about how those threads tend to devolve).

Despite what some users say I still think making safe mode primarily available from within Windows a very poor decision.

I'm not sure what you mean by "primarily available". There are several ways to get to safe mode, and that's one of them. You can also boot from install media, create a recovery disk ahead of time and boot from that, and F8 will work, but you only have a very small window to activate it (I think this is a bug, rather than designed that way). Worst case.. reset during boot, which causes it to prompt for safe mode after the power cycle. And yes, you can edit the boot menu to add a safe mode boot.

So in order to keep Windows eight on my machine, I have had no choice but to use a third party start menu. I think it would have been more sensible to make the task bar optional rather than remove it. Microsoft's marketing allegedly found few users who use the task bar. Umm then why are this forum and others full of people asking how to put it back?

I think you mean "make the start menu optional". This is one of those personal preference things that many people, including yourself, make absolute claims about that are simply absurd. You do not "have no other choice". You CAN use the start page. I do, and I have over 200 desktop apps installed alone, not counting the dozens of metro apps. I have no problem using the start page efficiently, and I don't have a touch screen.

I find the easiest way to do it is to simply use the search function. Hit the windows key, and start typing the first couple of letters of the app, and it's right there under my selection and I can just hit enter. Takes me 1/2 a second to find any app I want to run. This is FAR more efficient than searching through a hierarchical menu.

Unfortunately, all too many people (and I assume you're one of them), instantly decide they hate it, and immediately start looking for third party replacement tools to "fix" the problem, when in reality if you just used it a bit, you would figure out your own way to use it best, and it would be a non-issue. People had the same reaction to the XP start menu, switching instantly back to the 2000 style menu, and then again with Vista's new menu. People that actually gave it a chance found there were lots of things to like.

The fact of the matter is, if you let people switch back to the old way, they will never move to the new way, then you have to continue to support the old way forever. Pretty soon, you are supporting 200 different menus because everyone will have their own favorite from the past options.

And all that doesn't address the issue of how do you move people to the new style apps if you let them keep going back? What if Apple had kept PowerPC compatibility in OSX? Nobody would have ever written any x86 apps.

Within two days I have probably downloaded 95% of all the apps I am ever going to download./QUOTE]

Assuming you actually will use Metro apps, then that seems unlikely. New apps are released every day, and we've only seen the tip of the iceberg so far. Microsoft is investing heavily in promoting Metro app development. We're going to see a lot of new apps coming, and many of them will be quite new and interesting. To say you've already installed most of the apps you'll ever use is.. well, short sighted to say the least.

History is filled with people that made similar statements. Thomas J. Watson, the founder of IBM, once famously said "I Think There Is A World Market For Maybe 5 Computers". Things change, and it's probably true that there was a world market for only 5 computers that existed at the time he said that, but public acceptance of computers and computers themselves changed.

Whilst it is useful to have my laptop working more like my phone, l see no place for it on my main work pc.
The apps are also pretty superficial and I am becoming really annoyed by the metro loading screens for the apps. What was the point of making windows boot quickly if you loose any advantage when you start an app. I now find I am hardly ever using them, and tend to jump quickly into the standard desktop. I would say I am easily spending most of my time away from Metro in the desktop.

Not sure what you mean here. Few apps start instantly, it's just that attention doesn't get drawn to how slow they load by having a splash screen. Most of the startup time for Metro apps is because they depend on some service they connect to over the internet. Not all apps are service based though, and lots of them start very quickly.

Yes, it's true, lots of apps right now are superficial, and that's because they were done fast to get something out there. We're seeing the development of real apps now, though. When the first iPhone came out, there weren't many non-superficial apps either. Nor were there many android apps at first. It has to mature, and concluding that Metro apps will always be this way is again.. somewhat short sighted.

The real deal breaker for Metro is having the icons dominate the screen. Everyone in the office including me have individual desktop images, and nearly everyone uses the slide show to show multiple images. What I here you cry... that is still in Windows 8. Yes it is but its in the desktop and so you naturally work in the desktop. We all strive for our screens to look individual, and Metro severely limits this. Granted you will have different tiles in different places but they look the same! I just find Metro so boring to look at and sadly after a few weeks boring to use.

If you have multiple monitors, you will see your desktop wallpaper all the time. You can also customize the background of the Start page. I'm really not sure I get this argument. Tiles are no different from Icons. Tiles can have any kind of image they want, but so far people have not done much with them. That will change.

5) Everything that runs on windows 7 will run on windows 8. That's just incorrect. You cant rely on the upgrade advisor or the compatibility centre. Applications are shown as compatible which are not.

All OS upgrades have compatibility problems, and Windows 8 is no different. But, there are far fewer compatibility issues than even Windows 7 had. The Upgrade Advisor and compatibility center don't know about every app out there. They can only tell you which apps they KNOW are incompatible. Don't confuse not flagging something as incompatible with saying it is compatible.

Some apps break the rules, and thus they break when an OS change happens. Some apps use undocumented functions, which can also break when an OS changes. They're undocumented because they're likely to break. Some apps dig deep into the OS and insert themselves in the middle of things, those are also likely to break. You can't blame apps that do risky things on Microsoft or the OS.

6) use of windows 8 on a non touch screen is much easier in desktop than Metro, and it almost forces you out of Metro. It works, but only just. Its certainly not ergonomic or enjoyable.

I keep hearing claims like this, but nobody can ever substantiate them. Nobody has ever been able to explain in anything other than vague touchy-feely terms. This means it's a personal preference.

I personally have no issues with either mode. I actually find Metro to be easier to use with a mouse than the desktop, because icons are larger and easier to hit. Tell me, how many times have you been navigating a menu and accidentally moved off it and the menu collapses? Forcing you to start all over. That doesn't happen in Metro. This is particularly important for people with poor hand/eye coordination or poor vision or motor control.

But again, this is personal preference, and unless you can definitively explain why your argument is anything other that, we're going to have to disagree.

The fact is, people like different things. If you don't like it, that's fine. But please stop saying things like "use of windows 8 on a non touch screen is much easier in desktop than Metro". You may find that to be the case for you, but it's simply not the case for everyone.

Will the launch succeed? Not sure. Most of our pc suppliers allow us to pick which operating system we want installed so there is no immediate need to jump to 8. The consumer market is different new pcs tend to come preloaded. However the current financial climate is not really suited to people refreshing their pcs to any great extent.

Which is why Microsoft has adapted Windows to meet different markets. Because PC's are not the only thing people are buying, and are in fact buying phones and tablets at a much greater pace.

Windows 8's success may depend on the success of the tablets and phones. If those are popular, people are going to likely want to use an OS that works the same, integrates with their other devices, and runs the same apps.

If the tablets and phones do not succeed, then Windows 8 will have to stand on its own merits. And Metro will be irrelevant.

Will they grab a big chunk of the tablet market. Umm probably not people prefer Android and Iphone and visually they leave the windows eight surface for dead. It will sell, but not in the numbers it needs to.

Windows 8 Tablets come in two flavors. Windows 8 and Windows 8 RT, there's more than just the surface out there. Tablet makers from many companies are coming out with some great devices. Some of them are RT based, some of them are Windows 8 based. 8 based tablets can run all desktop apps as well, something which iPad's and Android devices can't. That's a huge advantage.

Apple may have the single most popular single phone and tablet, but Android phones and tablets from various manufacturers dwarf the iPhone and iPad in market share. Unless apple starts licensing iOS to third parties, I wouldn't expect any of that to change.

So I now have Windows eight an 7. The world did not end, but neither did it become a much better place to be. I initially hated it, but now I have warmed to it. But the only way I could get my laptop working the way I wanted was to restore basic windows functionality.

That's only because "the way you wanted it" was not Windows 8's way of doing things. Windows 8 is what it is. You either accept it, hack it, or don't buy it. There's not much other option. Complaining in a web forum doesn't change anything, although I suppose it does make you feel better.

I just don't understand what you hope to gain by it.

You can attack me all you want, but the content of the forum, is clear to see. Yes the visits to forum going down is probably due to many overcoming their installation issues which is good for windows 8. Yes people who use their laptops or pc's for recreational use really like windows 8. But those of us with deadlines to meet, and major apps to run. Metro gives us very little and for now on Desktops Windows7 is a better choice.

I find it highly insulting that you claim to speak for everyone else. That you imply that you must not really use a computer for anything if you like Windows 8. That you claim that people that use their computer for real work find Windows 8 unusable. And you wonder why people get passionate when you insult them in these ways.

I am a software developer, I use my computer 12+ hours a day. I use many apps and have deadlines like anyone else. I have no problem with Windows 8 because I gave it a real chance. Yeah, I was skeptical at first, and it took some time to get accustomed to it. But once I did, I find it MORE productive, faster, and more logical than previous versions (there are of course a few exceptions, as it's certainly not perfect, but then neither was Windows 7 or XP or any other my Galaxy SIII or my iPad).

Unless you have honestly given it a fair shake, and tried to use it for an extended period of time in it's native methods, then I will continue to discount any opinion about the usability of the interface. You simply cannot objectively judge something if you refuse to use it. And unless you can come up with solid, specific reasons for your claims, I will equally discount them as justifications or personal preference.

If you used it for 10 minutes and then raced to install third party software to make it look like Windows 7, then you simply have not actually tried. It's relatively easy to tell, because you use assumptions, rather than experience to justify your actions. The vast majority of people that actually USE windows 8 as it was intended, find that their assumptions were wrong. They find that things they initially hated from a knee jerk reaction, are either not so bad or quite good. Even you said your opinions have changed.

I applaud Microsoft for trying to do something different, but I think the jump to touch screen is too early, and will ultimately prove to be like the market for 3d TV's.....no where near as big as first predicted.

Windows 8 is not a touch screen OS. It's a touch screen *FRIENDLY* OS. A touch screen OS would mean it was designed to only be used as a touch screen, which is not the case in Windows 8. Windows 8 was designed to be usable by multiple methods, including touch screens. Previous tablet versions of Windows were not designed to be used in touch screens at all, and they failed miserably.

Do yourself a favor, and stop thinking of it as a Touch Screen OS. It's not. It's very usable by any input method. It's different, though, and requires some retraining of your habits. It's like buying a new car that has shift paddles rather than a stick on the floor.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Windows 8.1 Pro
    CPU
    Intel i7 3770K
    Motherboard
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD4 TH
    Memory
    16GB DDR3 1600
    Graphics Card(s)
    nVidia GTX 650
    Sound Card
    Onboard Audio
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Auria 27" IPS + 2x Samsung 23"
    Screen Resolution
    2560x1440 + 2x 2048x1152
    Hard Drives
    Corsair m4 256GB, 2 WD 2TB drives
    Case
    Antec SOLO II
    Keyboard
    Microsoft Natural Ergonomic Keyboard 4000
    Mouse
    Logitech MX

Mystere

Power User
VIP Member
Power User
Thanks MDMD yes some people find it easy to use Metro on a PC, I am disabled so that probably does not help.

I would think that metro would be EASIER to use if you are disabled than the start menu. I suppose it depends on your disability, but I can't imagine any disability that Metro would make more difficult than a menu.

My nervousnous in putting it on our main pcs probably stems from the bad experience we had being early adopters of Windows seven, so I freely admit I am biased on that one.

Ok, so you had lots of problems with Windows 7 initially as well (you seem to be the type that has lots of problems where others do not in everything). So why exactly is Windows 8 so different?

Although the first week was hell I had to reinstall four times before I worked out that there are just some app data folders you don't add privileges to.

Right, now I understand. You screw around in the internals of the OS immediately, and then wonder why things break. Ok. Methinks your wounds are largely self-inflicted.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Windows 8.1 Pro
    CPU
    Intel i7 3770K
    Motherboard
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD4 TH
    Memory
    16GB DDR3 1600
    Graphics Card(s)
    nVidia GTX 650
    Sound Card
    Onboard Audio
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Auria 27" IPS + 2x Samsung 23"
    Screen Resolution
    2560x1440 + 2x 2048x1152
    Hard Drives
    Corsair m4 256GB, 2 WD 2TB drives
    Case
    Antec SOLO II
    Keyboard
    Microsoft Natural Ergonomic Keyboard 4000
    Mouse
    Logitech MX

SIW2

Well-Known Member
Team Member
You are entitled to your opinions - and to recount your own experiences here. That is what a forum is for.

You expressed yourself in a normal and acceptable way.

There are a lot of misconceptions and misunderstandings re win 8.

Mainly because most people don't understand the purpose of it and where MS is heading.

There is no reason why they should understand that. Quite the opposite.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    7/8/ubuntu/Linux Deepin
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop

lehnerus2000

Power User
VIP Member
Power User
Having to edit the Boot Menu to add "Safe Mode" is another stupid innovation in W8.
A classic example of "change for change's sake".

I thought that I read that you could access "Safe Mode" using "Shift + F8" at boot up.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 (64 bit), Linux Mint 18.3 MATE (64 bit)
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
    System Manufacturer/Model
    n/a
    CPU
    AMD Phenom II x6 1055T, 2.8 GHz
    Motherboard
    ASRock 880GMH-LE/USB3
    Memory
    8GB DDR3 1333 G-Skill Ares F3-1333C9D-8GAO (4GB x 2)
    Graphics Card(s)
    ATI Radeon HD6450
    Sound Card
    Realtek?
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Samsung S23B350
    Screen Resolution
    1920x1080
    Hard Drives
    Western Digital 1.5 TB (SATA), Western Digital 2 TB (SATA), Western Digital 3 TB (SATA)
    Case
    Tower
    Mouse
    Wired Optical
    Other Info
    Linux Mint 16 MATE (64 bit) replaced with Linux Mint 17 MATE (64 bit) - 2014-05-17
    Linux Mint 14 MATE (64 bit) replaced with Linux Mint 16 MATE (64 bit) - 2013-11-13
    Ubuntu 10.04 (64 bit) replaced with Linux Mint 14 MATE (64 bit) - 2013-01-14
    RAM & Graphics Card Upgraded - 2013-01-13
    Monitor Upgraded - 2012-04-20
    System Upgraded - 2011-05-21, 2010-07-14
    HDD Upgraded - 2010-08-11, 2011-08-24,
Top