Valve's Linux-powered Steam Machines gather steam | ZDNetOnce SteamOS is released, Valve assures users that they'll be able to build their own Steam Machines. Further, Valve stated that hackers will be able to install their own operating system, change the hardware, and install additional software on the forthcoming Steam Machines. In other words, Valve CEO Gabe Newell, who proclaimed that "Windows 8 is a catastrophe for everyone in the PC space" in part of its move to more closed systems, really does seem to want SteamOS to be truly open source and for Steam Machines to be really open systems not locked down by Secure Boot.
Sorry, Lee. I don't mean to put anyone down, much less you, but it seems true to me that people, and especially those who are older (but still just as valuable!) do not like much change. As one gets older, one likes to feel at ease. Settle down, own a house, etc. I find that learning new things even for me becomes a hassle (stupid new iPhones...). So naturally, older people may resist change moreso than one younger. I do not think ill of 'old folk', you guys are the gems that brought us wee folk such great things to begin with!I think it is time to stop bringing down us older folks (69). A great deal of us were using and writing code for computers and systems before some of you were even born. Sorry, albeit windows 8 was not that hard to figure out. Also the average computer user is not all that stupid when it comes to today's systems and OS's. A great deal of today's user have had computer classes while in high school, and in some cases middle and elementary school. It is time to look at the work force for another large part of the world's population that have also learned to use computers.
I can install a start menu. I have installed this now on 6 of my friends and families computers for them.. Everyone of them has liked the OS more with the 3rd party app than without. All had been using the OS for at least a week before I installed the start menu for them. I believe what I believe and obviously that is a subjective thing. Still, most out there agree. You folks are the minority. A year later you are still the minority. No poll out there says otherwise. ...
Give the AVG user some credit. They can install a 3rd party start menu as easy as software for antivirus, printers, etc.The Avg user does not know how to restore the start menu with 3rd party apps which is the main reason I say that they should not have to. They should not have to resort to 3rd party apps that change the look and feel for something like this.....
Maybe because you fight it and treat it like a crap sandwich. I've got 14 friends that have gotten 8 since I did. Mainly because of how I've accepted the graphical start screen and expressed my opinion in a positive way. Not one of them want the old style start menu back after using the tiles for 15 seconds.Part of why I have intentionally chosen to not use 3rd party start menu up to now is that I really want to grow to like the start screen.. It just has not happened up to now....
I am sick of typing on this subject.. It would be far better to carry on a conversation with someone who thought replacing the start menu with the start screen was a good move, I just have been unsuccessful in meeting a person who feels this way up to now. Enjoy folks!! I am glad you like it! I truly am...
hmmmmmm!, sorry Mr. Muicslover, albeit I thought you were through with this discussion. It is hard to stay away when you are very passionate about a specific subject matter. . .No.. If the Avg user knew with ease how to install 3rd party start menu replacements, then I would not have needed to install it on as many PC's as I have. Most don't even know it exists.. They just call me up in a bit of a panic... Look, I have used a lot of different OS.. I support hospital computer systems from home scattered across the US, which are running a range of Unix/Linux/Windows. I have been working on computers for well over 15 years. Today, I installed virtualbox on my machine as I am preparing to set up a new HTPC Media Center machine, and I wanted to experiment with various distros. I decided to go to my all apps screen and look for the newly installed program, which is what most people will do by the way, assuming they are able to find it. I knew perfectly well that I could type in virt.. and be done.. I wanted to find it. My all apps screen is a mosh.. First of all there are two separate sections for some reason.. A-Z and then A names -Z names.. It took me darn close to 30 seconds to find the app which was in the A-name to Z-name section, the 2nd section, under Oracle. Those fine days of clicking on all programs and being easily lead to your new app which is displayed temporarily in a different color are gone. I thought maybe the app didn't install for a few secs, until I was able to find it under 'Oracle'. I then pinned it to my start screen, to avoid this in the future.
My point is, I can use it.. So can the avg individual. The start screen does not make anything easier, and feels at times, even after a year, more like a hindrance. I would love to sit down and chat with someone somewhere who actually agrees with you all, that the new here is better than the old.. I honestly try hard not to taint folks view of the new OS. I do not show any bias until they come to me for answers, then I help them. I try to show them how to use the new. I try to even paint it in a positive light. No one likes it... and when enough is enough, I install classic shell, and they are happy...
There are things I like about 8. I just would have liked it better, had the given us more options..
There are things I like about 8. I just would have liked it better, had the given us more options..
Lol! Heaven knows we all have beaten the dead horse to, well, another death.
I get this feeling that Ms would like all to forget that 8 ever existed and move on to 8.1. Admittedly I think they made a big mistake with too much change that are all too shocking and not a whole lot of personal options. At least in 8.1 one boot to the Desktop and I use All Apps instead of Start Screen. I know this doesn't solve the problem of the Start Menu being omitted, but at least there's 3rd party programs that do so.
Quite frankly I am shocked by some members that were abhorred with 8 that seem to take to 8.1 with some enthusiasm and are moving on.
I think we should all let the dead horse lay and all move on. Golf is enough. < Lol! That's what my Android phone just suggested while speaking into it "Enough is enough". I like that better.
Golf anyone?![]()
No.. If the Avg user knew with ease how to install 3rd party start menu replacements, then I would not have needed to install it on as many PC's as I have. Most don't even know it exists.. They just call me up in a bit of a panic... I install classic shell, and they are happy...
8 took some things away. 8 is full of options being discovered daily. It lacks some of what we were use to. Many people miss the 'Live Desktop' option in XP allowing the animated .gifs to be displayed on desktop. and XP's Picture & Fax Viewer.There are things I like about 8. I just would have liked it better, had the given us more options..
Golf anyone?![]()
Ah, so you're getting worked up about a potential future situation that may never happen.The larger issue is that all the current desktop apps may eventually be phased out, leaving us with only tifkam apps.... and that would be a freakin' tragedy, an actual disaster of epic proportions....
An opinion piece by Paul Thurrott is not a rebuttal to what I said. It's still a potential future situation that may never happen.Ah, so you're getting worked up about a potential future situation that may never happen.The larger issue is that all the current desktop apps may eventually be phased out, leaving us with only tifkam apps.... and that would be a freakin' tragedy, an actual disaster of epic proportions....
Windows Desktop Death | Windows 8 content from Windows IT Pro