Windows 8 and 8.1 Forums


Show us your Unigine Heaven Benchmark scores!

  1. #21


    Wherever life takes me.
    Posts : 8
    Windows 8.1 Pro 64bit


    Run again as default but the second GPU with the same settings as the first (they were not the same on the previous run):Powered by Unigine Engine

    Heaven Benchmark v3.0 Basic

    FPS: 141.0
    Scores: 3552
    Min FPS: 42.2
    Max FPS: 266.0
    Hardware

    Binary: Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1600 Release Mar 7 2012
    Operating system: Windows NT 6.2 (build 9200) 64bit
    CPU model: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3930K CPU @ 3.20GHz
    CPU flags: 3209MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE41 SSE42 HTT
    GPU model: AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series 9.2.0.0 CrossFireX 3072Mb
    Settings

    Render: direct3d11
    Mode: 2560x1440 fullscreen
    Shaders: high
    Textures: high
    Filter: trilinear
    Anisotropy: 4x
    Occlusion: enabled
    Refraction: enabled
    Volumetric: enabled
    Tessellation: disabled

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  2. #22


    Posts : 1,121
    Windows 8.1 x64


    You said you wanted to check Windows 7 against Windows 8.......

    The Nvidia card is running as PCIe 3.0.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Benchmark.JPG  
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  3. #23


    Wynnum Australia
    Posts : 466
    Windows-10-Pro-Build-11099.rs1-x64


    New Benchmarks with the latest Drivers (v310.90) and a bit further OC Gigabyte GTX670-OC-2GB:




    Uploaded with ImageShack.us




    Uploaded with ImageShack.us




    Uploaded with ImageShack.us

    Would be still able to push the GPU and CPU a bit further.

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  4. #24


    Posts : 40
    Windows 8.1 Pro


    900/1800 Gpu Stock Cpu Stock Heaven settings
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Capture.PNG  
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  5. #25


    South Coast NSW, Australia
    Posts : 615
    Windows 8.1 'Ultimate' RTM 64 bit (Pro/WMC).


    I ran this the other night (in the middle of the big Australian heat-wave.

    It overheated this machine to the point of shut-down.

    When I finally got it to run, the results bore NO relationship to the hardware I was running it on.

    OR to the results posted.

    THEN I realised that you are all running horribly over-clocked desktop boxes.

    My lappy simply can't compete.

    Anyway, this is what I got at 1024x768 (it dies at the native res of 1920x1080).
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 1024.PNG  
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  6. #26


    South Coast NSW, Australia
    Posts : 615
    Windows 8.1 'Ultimate' RTM 64 bit (Pro/WMC).


    Same machine @1920x1080...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 1920.PNG  
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  7. #27


    South Coast NSW, Australia
    Posts : 615
    Windows 8.1 'Ultimate' RTM 64 bit (Pro/WMC).


    It's 'only' a laptop. But a very powerful Gen 2 i7 quad-core.

    These scores should be MUCH higher than I seem to be getting.

    Wonder why they aren't?

    The fact that it will NOT use my GeForce for the test may (does) have
    a lot to do with the poor scores.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  8. #28


    Wynnum Australia
    Posts : 466
    Windows-10-Pro-Build-11099.rs1-x64


    Quote Originally Posted by Wenda View Post
    It's 'only' a laptop. But a very powerful Gen 2 i7 quad-core.

    These scores should be MUCH higher than I seem to be getting.

    Wonder why they aren't?

    The fact that it will NOT use my GeForce for the test may (does) have
    a lot to do with the poor scores.
    A laptop will be always much weaker then a desktop-pc and it doesn't really matter if you over-clock or not.

    One of my mates tried to compete with his laptop against my desktop in the 3DMark 11 benchmarks and got only 2800 vs the 13000 I got (entry level). When I increase the CPU-OC from 4200MHz to 4900MHz as an example, I don't gain a higher score in the 3DMark 11 benchmark anymore. The further OC of my GPU let me gain maybe something between 3-10fps overall, which is only worth it if a game is already running with a low frame-rate.

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  9. #29


    Posts : 502
    Vanilla 8 Pro x64


    Latest

    Click image for larger version
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  10. #30


    Wynnum Australia
    Posts : 466
    Windows-10-Pro-Build-11099.rs1-x64


    @SmartEyeball
    This are quite good numbers for only using the Intel-GPU.

    Edit:

    Looks like that the Unigine doesn't recognise your SLI-Setup, but still great numbers.

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

Page 3 of 11 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Show us your Unigine Heaven Benchmark scores!
Related Threads
Control Panel All Tasks List Shortcut - Windows 7 Forums It will turn into a super Control Panel with a variety of functions organized by group. You can rename it if you think it is blasphemous.
Windows 8 Scores Another Big Win in Scotland
Microsoft scores biggest patent licensee yet: Foxconn | Ars Technica
Three steps to heaven? in Installation & Setup
Hi All, Normally I would just blast ahead with this and "damn the torpedoes" but with a head thick with cold I'm happy to ask for advice. I've got Win7 64 bit running fine on an SSD (see screenshots below), and Win 8 Pro 64 Bit in a partition on HDD also running fine. Vista 64 Bit is on the...
Windows 8 and IE10, a Match Made in Speculation Heaven - Softpedia
More - Windows 8 Feature Wish List Item: Intelligent WEI Scores - Softpedia
Eight Forums Android App Eight Forums IOS App Follow us on Facebook