Win8 adaption really low at this point in the beta cycle.

johnpombrio

New Member
Power User
Messages
693
Location
Manchester CT
Win8 adaption really low at this point in the beta cycle 0.18%.

Windows 8 Lags Windows 7 in Previews | PCWorld

PC World pulled out this stat which shows how few people are presently using Win8 of some flavor (0.19%). Win7 Beta was much higher at this point in its launch, nearly 4 times the amount.

With an October launch, these numbers are meager. Are these published stats wrong? Has anyone seen a different number for Win8 users?
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Windows 8.1 Pro 64 bit GA
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
    CPU
    i7-4770K Haswell
    Motherboard
    ASUS Z87-PRO
    Memory
    16 GB of Corsair 1866
    Graphics Card(s)
    GTX 780
    Sound Card
    Cooler Master Storm Headphones
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Dell 27 inch U2711 IPS
    Screen Resolution
    2560 by 1440
    Hard Drives
    Samsung 840 Pro 250GB SSD plus 2 3 TB drives
    PSU
    Corsair-750
    Case
    Corsair White Graphite Series 600T
    Cooling
    Corsair H00i Water
    Keyboard
    Corsair K90
    Mouse
    Logitech G9 Laser
    Internet Speed
    6.3 MBps
    Browser
    Firefox
    Antivirus
    MS
Hi there
Is this really any surprise -- after all what does W8 really offer people who are happy using W7 at this point -- remember also people (nearly 50% of Windows users) are STLL using XP.

Of course on these forums we get people who want to try out new OS'es but the average joe doesn't really care -- they buy a computer, take it home and expect it to work nagware and all -- if it wasn't like this do you think for a minute the amount of crapware on OEM machines would still be around.

W8 could have a place but with that hideous metro stuff most "Normal" PC users will just ignore it.

Cheers
jimbo
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Linux Centos 7, W8.1, W7, W2K3 Server W10
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
    Monitor(s) Displays
    1 X LG 40 inch TV
    Hard Drives
    SSD's * 3 (Samsung 840 series) 250 GB
    2 X 3 TB sata
    5 X 1 TB sata
    Internet Speed
    0.12 GB/s (120Mb/s)
It doesn't surprise me. XP, Vista, to Windows 7 :thumbsup: XP, Vista, or Windows 7 to Windows 8, :doh:
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Windows 10 Education 64 Bit
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
    System Manufacturer/Model
    Asus
    CPU
    AMD Phenom II X4 980 Black Edition Deneb 3.7GHz
    Motherboard
    ASUS M4N68T-M V2 µATX Motherboard
    Memory
    8GB 4GBx2 Kingston PC10600 DDR3 1333 Memory
    Graphics Card(s)
    NVIDIA Geforce GT640 2 Gig DDR3 PCIe
    Sound Card
    VIA VT1708s High Definition Audio 8-channel Onboard
    Monitor(s) Displays
    22" LG E2242 1080p and 2 19" I-INC AG191D
    Screen Resolution
    1280x1024 - 1920x1080 - 1280x1024
    Hard Drives
    Crucial MX100 256 GB SSD and 500 GB WD Blue SATA
    PSU
    Thermaltake TR 620
    Case
    Power Up Black ATX Mid-Tower Case
    Cooling
    Stock heatsink fan
    Keyboard
    Logitech Wireless K350 Wave
    Mouse
    Logitech M570 Trackball and T650 TouchPad
    Internet Speed
    80 Mbps Down 30 Mbps Up
    Browser
    Internet Explorer 11
    Antivirus
    Windows Defender
    Other Info
    HP DVD1040e Lightscribe - External USB2
I find this odd, I didn't even care about Windows 7 as I didn't see any point in upgrading to it, everything it did Vista could do. But Windows 8 on the over hand has given me a lot of reasons to upgrade.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Windows 8
Depends what you do really.

For many real enthusiasts , metro and the concentration as a consumption device are a pain in the arse.

Even more so if you like to mod, build pe and that kind of thing - it is very restrictive.

Even for those who don't do anything complicated, metro is weird, and there is a huge objection to the removal of choice and the attempt to force users to do things MS way - mostly to push them into the MS clouds.

It is way too aggressive.

MS have succeeded in alienating a big chunk of their existing users. Completely unnecessary.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    7/8/ubuntu/Linux Deepin
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
I find this odd, I didn't even care about Windows 7 as I didn't see any point in upgrading to it, everything it did Vista could do. But Windows 8 on the over hand has given me a lot of reasons to upgrade.

What a strange thing to say.

Windows 7 introduced the new taskbar with pinning, jumplists, progress indicators, etc, merging the original and limited window-finding capability of the taskbar with new program organization and launching capabilities, obsoleting 3rd party program managers by providing an alternative to the unusable Start Menu and desktop. Windows 8 replaces the unusable but occasionally useful Start Menu with the unusable and useless Metro Start Screen.

Windows 8 brings a ribbon to Windows Explorer. Finally, I have a direct and easy way to show hidden files when necessary! Worth $40? Nah. Windows 8 also brings a bunch of pathetic "apps" filled with in-your-face ads that represent Microsoft's hopes of monetizing everything you do, and in developing this garbage, they've neglected many other things.

Windows 7 introduced Homegroups (good) and Libaries (sort of good). Windows 8 introduces Storage Spaces (good, but most people won't care).

Windows 7 brought a few improvements to Media Center that had their origins in that horribly buggy Vista TV Pack, and it later added CableCARD support for all. Windows 8 adds nothing to Media Center, fixes no bugs, removes a couple of capabilities important to HTPC users that have appliance-like HTPCs, and actually makes it a paid upgrade.

Windows 7 brought much better driver support to Windows. Windows 8 will strive to be as good.

In reality, there were many reasons to upgrade to Windows 7, and there is essentially no reason to upgrade to Windows 8. In fact, there are many more reasons to reject Windows 8 than there are to upgrade to it.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Windows 8.1 Pro with Media Center
Makes perfect sense. Windows 8 is designed for the Metro interface, but there aren't very many Metro apps yet; so Metro just adds another unwieldy step to using Desktop applications.

I personally would love to use Windows 8 on my HTPC, but I need three applications to be ported to true Metro:

Google Chrome

Media Browser, or another application that manages my Movies and TV Shows. Also Metro doesn't use DirectShow, so I'd need a new codec pack.

Blu-ray player.



Until I can get these three apps, Windows 8 is useless to me.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Windows 8.1
    Computer type
    Laptop
    System Manufacturer/Model
    Asus Tansformer Book Flip TP500LN
    CPU
    Intel i5-4210U
    Memory
    8GB DDR3 SDRAM
    Graphics Card(s)
    Nvidia Geforce GT 840M
    Monitor(s) Displays
    15" Touchscreen
    Screen Resolution
    1366 x 768
    Hard Drives
    1TB Hybrid
    Mouse
    Microsoft Wireless Mobile Mouse 4000
I personally would love to use Windows 8 on my HTPC

Metro might make a tiny amount of sense for HTPC purposes if Metro tiles were nested like folders are. As it stands right now, sure, you could have a bunch of unrelated apps "unified" in a weak sense by the Metro start screen, but they would appear in a sea of apps that have no business being presented alongside programs designed for a 10' interface. This is important, because you'll be bouncing in and out of apps to the Start screen to switch. Maybe you can just try to stay in your little island of disconnected media apps. I guess if you're adept with Autohotkey and remote control hacking you could configure keys to launch the various major "apps", functionality that's already part of the unified 10' programs like Media Center and XBMC. I guess if you want to be Metro all the way, you have to figure out how to make, say, the Music app stop playing when you switch to the TV app and tune in a channel. Remember, all these apps are disconnected. They're unified only in the most superficial of ways by the Metro Start Screen. OTOH, I'd like my TV app to be displayable in a window that doesn't take up the whole screen, that I can size and place wherever I want, which is completely at odds with Metro.

The 10' interface problem was solved 10 years ago. Metro just brings new problems to the table and doesn't give you any new capabilities.

but I need three applications to be ported to true Metro:

Google Chrome

Media Browser, or another application that manages my Movies and TV Shows. Also Metro doesn't use DirectShow, so I'd need a new codec pack.

Blu-ray player.

I use XBMC for all non-Recorded TV, library-based video, and it is excellent. I don't need Media Browser because XBMC does what it does for free, and I'm not keeping a lot of huge, commercial-laden MPEG2 files around long-term anyway so don't care about having a good library system inside Media Center. I don't need potentially buggy, spyware-laden codec packs because everything is built into XBMC; in fact, I've never downloaded much less installed a codec pack. As for playing physical Blurays, I gave up on that long ago on the PC and bought a standalone player That Just Works WRT things like 1080p24 and the lossless audio codecs. That was a great decision. I only wish I had made it before buying PowerDVD, WinDVD, and Arcsoft TMT. On the plus side, I learned my lesson and will never buy another such program.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Windows 8.1 Pro with Media Center
I think that Windows 7's beta adoption numbers were much higher for one reasons, because people on Vista didn't like it that much. Windows 7 was billed as the cure for Vista, and lots of Vista users moved to it in beta. Most people are happy with Win7, and as such only the bleeding edge adopters are really running it.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Windows 8.1 Pro
    CPU
    Intel i7 3770K
    Motherboard
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD4 TH
    Memory
    16GB DDR3 1600
    Graphics Card(s)
    nVidia GTX 650
    Sound Card
    Onboard Audio
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Auria 27" IPS + 2x Samsung 23"
    Screen Resolution
    2560x1440 + 2x 2048x1152
    Hard Drives
    Corsair m4 256GB, 2 WD 2TB drives
    Case
    Antec SOLO II
    Keyboard
    Microsoft Natural Ergonomic Keyboard 4000
    Mouse
    Logitech MX
The 10' interface problem was solved 10 years ago. Metro just brings new problems to the table and doesn't give you any new capabilities.


I use XBMC for all non-Recorded TV, library-based video, and it is excellent. I don't need Media Browser because XBMC does what it does for free, and I'm not keeping a lot of huge, commercial-laden MPEG2 files around long-term anyway so don't care about having a good library system inside Media Center. I don't need potentially buggy, spyware-laden codec packs because everything is built into XBMC; in fact, I've never downloaded much less installed a codec pack. As for playing physical Blurays, I gave up on that long ago on the PC and bought a standalone player That Just Works WRT things like 1080p24 and the lossless audio codecs. That was a great decision. I only wish I had made it before buying PowerDVD, WinDVD, and Arcsoft TMT. On the plus side, I learned my lesson and will never buy another such program.

I simply use my HTPC for videos, music, and DVDs/blurays. I have no intention of just dumping everything onto my hard drive and sacrificing metadata and the ability to watch movies my friends bring over or that I rent.

My intention is to populate the first column with applications that would be useful for a HTPC, such as the three apps I mentioned and also weather, news, and anything else that I find useful (maybe some games, or Netflix Metro)

Metro might make a tiny amount of sense for HTPC purposes if Metro tiles were nested like folders are. As it stands right now, sure, you could have a bunch of unrelated apps "unified" in a weak sense by the Metro start screen, but they would appear in a sea of apps that have no business being presented alongside programs designed for a 10' interface.

I'm afraid I don't understand this statement. I would be basically using Metro Home as a replacement to having WMC on. Each application would be acting like a WMC/XBMC category (Movies, TV Shows, Pictures), and none of these things are organized in folders. Heck, WMC's subcategory system is crap, as I had to use MCS to strip out everything That I don't use or can't use (such as radio and TV Shows, since I don't have a tuner).

Additionally, Metro is very modular, and Microsoft is pushing it as the default interface. In case you havent checked, neither XBMC not WMC have perfect plugins. XBMC doesn't properly work with Blurays, and WMC doesn't have a single Weather app that is not boggy, ugly, or doesn't have my town (and the latter is impossible to uninstall)

With metro, I can have front and center access to my picture library, Music, movies and TV Shows (assuming MB does come and allows for separate applications), disk playback, internet, and any media streaming applications I find. And it wil be easy to access and no risk of accidentally dropping to the desktop, Which is good because this will be a central computer that everyone can use to watch movies and stuff.

And like I said: I'd love to do this, but it needs certain applications that currently don't exist.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Windows 8.1
    Computer type
    Laptop
    System Manufacturer/Model
    Asus Tansformer Book Flip TP500LN
    CPU
    Intel i5-4210U
    Memory
    8GB DDR3 SDRAM
    Graphics Card(s)
    Nvidia Geforce GT 840M
    Monitor(s) Displays
    15" Touchscreen
    Screen Resolution
    1366 x 768
    Hard Drives
    1TB Hybrid
    Mouse
    Microsoft Wireless Mobile Mouse 4000
The 10' interface problem was solved 10 years ago. Metro just brings new problems to the table and doesn't give you any new capabilities.


I use XBMC for all non-Recorded TV, library-based video, and it is excellent. I don't need Media Browser because XBMC does what it does for free, and I'm not keeping a lot of huge, commercial-laden MPEG2 files around long-term anyway so don't care about having a good library system inside Media Center. I don't need potentially buggy, spyware-laden codec packs because everything is built into XBMC; in fact, I've never downloaded much less installed a codec pack. As for playing physical Blurays, I gave up on that long ago on the PC and bought a standalone player That Just Works WRT things like 1080p24 and the lossless audio codecs. That was a great decision. I only wish I had made it before buying PowerDVD, WinDVD, and Arcsoft TMT. On the plus side, I learned my lesson and will never buy another such program.

I simply use my HTPC for videos, music, and DVDs/blurays. I have no intention of just dumping everything onto my hard drive and sacrificing metadata and the ability to watch movies my friends bring over or that I rent.

OK... I don't know why you're telling me that, but... OK. I don't know why you think you'd be sacrificing metadata or the ability to play physical media or how that relates to what I said. XBMC is great about metadata and has an outstanding library capability. My understanding is that the current XBMC has improved Bluray support and should play commercial movies as long as you're running something like AnyDVD. If you're not running AnyDVD, I don't know why you want to play these things on a computer, because you gain all the problems of a PC without eliminating the many minutes of non-skippable promos, threats, etc that have turned so many people off. As I said earlier, my standalone Bluray player works well, but I hate using it because of these things and the slow loading and the menus.

My intention is to populate the first column with applications that would be useful for a HTPC, such as the three apps I mentioned and also weather, news, and anything else that I find useful (maybe some games, or Netflix Metro)

OK, so you're hoping a set of Metro apps will appear that are specifically designed for the 10' interface so you can put them on the start screen in a little island area in the sea of apps that don't work in the 10' interface and have no business being presented alongside them.

Metro might make a tiny amount of sense for HTPC purposes if Metro tiles were nested like folders are. As it stands right now, sure, you could have a bunch of unrelated apps "unified" in a weak sense by the Metro start screen, but they would appear in a sea of apps that have no business being presented alongside programs designed for a 10' interface.

I'm afraid I don't understand this statement. I would be basically using Metro Home as a replacement to having WMC on. Each application would be acting like a WMC/XBMC category (Movies, TV Shows, Pictures), and none of these things are organized in folders. Heck, WMC's subcategory system is crap, as I had to use MCS to strip out everything That I don't use or can't use (such as radio and TV Shows, since I don't have a tuner).

AFAIK, Metro tiles cannot be placed in containers, folders, whatever you want to call them; instead, the Metro start screen is an infinitely scrolling roll. In particular, you can't create a container corresponding to your ersatz Media Center or XBMC replacement, that would contain just your hypothetical multimedia apps.

Aside from this, it sounds like you do understand it. You just want to do something that has no advantages I can see and comes with new problems and limitations, some of which I described in the part you clipped, which I'm restoring below:

This is important, because you'll be bouncing in and out of apps to the Start screen to switch. Maybe you can just try to stay in your little island of disconnected media apps. I guess if you're adept with Autohotkey and remote control hacking you could configure keys to launch the various major "apps", functionality that's already part of the unified 10' programs like Media Center and XBMC. I guess if you want to be Metro all the way, you have to figure out how to make, say, the Music app stop playing when you switch to the TV app and tune in a channel. Remember, all these apps are disconnected. They're unified only in the most superficial of ways by the Metro Start Screen. OTOH, I'd like my TV app to be displayable in a window that doesn't take up the whole screen, that I can size and place wherever I want, which is completely at odds with Metro.

Some people seem to think that if these media center components appear, they will fit naturally into the Metro start screen, and all work together seamlessly and automatically. That's simply not true, and frankly it makes no sense to want this. Perhaps one of your aforementioned friends will come over, navigate out of the hypothetical Metro TV app to the start screen and end up in Mail or something instead of the hypothetical Metro DVD app. That's the sort of thing that will happen when you present a lot of superfluous choices on an equal footing with legitimate choices. It is a basic tenet of interface design to exclude superfluous choices, and what you want to do will result in a whole Metro Start Screen full of them.

Additionally, Metro is very modular, and Microsoft is pushing it as the default interface. In case you havent checked, neither XBMC not WMC have perfect plugins.

I'm not aware of any perfect software, nor am I aware that Metro will allow people to write perfect software. I don't get the comment.

XBMC doesn't properly work with Blurays, and WMC doesn't have a single Weather app that is not boggy, ugly, or doesn't have my town (and the latter is impossible to uninstall)

I don't care about Bluray on the PC as already mentioned, but my understanding is that the latest version of XBMC has some support as long as you're using something like AnyDVD. The XBMC weather app works fine for me. I only use Media Center for Recorded TV, specifically CableCARD. There are much more capable, less buggy programs available for everything else.

With metro, I can have front and center access to my picture library, Music, movies and TV Shows (assuming MB does come and allows for separate applications), disk playback, internet, and any media streaming applications I find. And it wil be easy to access and no risk of accidentally dropping to the desktop, Which is good because this will be a central computer that everyone can use to watch movies and stuff.

And like I said: I'd love to do this, but it needs certain applications that currently don't exist.

OK, I guess you could take everything off the Metro Start Screen except for the multimedia apps to eliminate people getting themselves lost. But you still have to account for the lack of coordination between these presumably separately developed apps, which I touched on earlier. Metro is just a generic program launcher. It is a 1' touch interface grafted onto a desktop OS by Microsoft's desperation over losing the mobile market. It is not a 10' interface. That it works to some limited extent at 10' is incidental; it's a side-effect of needing to use huge interface elements to accommodate fat fingers at 1' and remote controls sending keystrokes to the program with focus. One could cobble something together literally in a day that would be just as functional and bring the same capabilities WRT to being the switchboard for your multimedia apps. As with Windows 8, then all you'd have to do is write the apps, because none of them currently exist. LOL. And good luck on that; the HTPC was never mainstream, and it and the 10' interface are only becoming less and less relevant, as can be seen by Microsoft making Media Center a paid upgrade and eliminating features such as starting the computer in Media Center.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Windows 8.1 Pro with Media Center
Back
Top