Windows 8 and 8.1 Forums


What did people do when Windows 95 came out?

  1. #1


    Posts : 5,707
    Windows 8.1 Pro

    What did people do when Windows 95 came out?


    I want to discuss something that probably might be in the wrong forum (sorry!) about the closest UI experience comparison to Windows 8: 95.

    Now, for the older folk out there that remember, what was it when Windows 95 came out, the consumer reaction, and the business reaction, especially the ones that had Windows 3 and transitioned over to 95?

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  2. #2


    Posts : 1,925
    Windows 8.1 Pro


    Windows 95 was well received. There was some sarcastic comments, like why do you have to click on start to stop it. But, in general, other than the OS/2 people, it was well liked.

    There wasn't anywhere near the installed base as there is now. The average machine had 1-4 MB of memory (yes, that's Megabyte, not Gigabyte) and there was some complaining that Windows 95 really needed 8MB (and 8MB of memory at the time cost about $400).

    There was a lot to like about it, and it was a LOT more stable than Windows 3.11. And you could really multitask.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  3. #3


    Posts : 1,353
    Windows 8 Pro/Windows 8 Pro/Windows 7 64 Bit64Bit/Windows XP


    Quote Originally Posted by Coke Robot View Post
    I want to discuss something that probably might be in the wrong forum (sorry!) about the closest UI experience comparison to Windows 8: 95.

    Now, for the older folk out there that remember, what was it when Windows 95 came out, the consumer reaction, and the business reaction, especially the ones that had Windows 3 and transitioned over to 95?
    The bigger problem was actually going from DOS to Windows, this is nothing compared to that. I even used DOS More than Windows, but could always see the future benefits of Windows. People just hated Windows. Back in those days you really had to know about using computers, there was no plug and play, everything was hard work to get setup, but enjoyable, it gave you a sense of achievement.

    Windows 95 was pretty well received as far as I can remember and it was the start of plug and play, things became simpler. It was a major step up from Windows 3.11. From what I can remember about business, most took a long long time to change over from DOS. I can remember offices running WordPerfect for DOS and Lotus for many years after Windows came out.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  4. #4


    Posts : 5,707
    Windows 8.1 Pro


    So if someone using DOS, or Windows 3.11, went and used 95, would had it been difficult and frustrating at times?
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  5. #5


    Posts : 1,353
    Windows 8 Pro/Windows 8 Pro/Windows 7 64 Bit64Bit/Windows XP


    Quote Originally Posted by Coke Robot View Post
    So if someone using DOS, or Windows 3.11, went and used 95, would had it been difficult and frustrating at times?
    I would say for the average user, very frustrating and difficult, but I'd come over from the Commodore 64 and a couple of Amigas the 500 and 2000, I always liked change, the more the better, I enjoyed the challenge. I was completely self taught, never even knew anyone else with a computer for years, there was just me. I even managed to do a bit of coding on the Amigas and made a couple of little games, one a pinball game.
    Nothing has changed over the years though, Microsoft has always had an image problem, people have always complained, the exact opposite to the Apple Loyalists.

    I'm absolutely convinced if Microsoft were to give their Operating systems away for free, people would be complaining they weren't being paid to take it. It's always been this way and looks like it will remain so.
    Have a look at any tech site, the bloggers just can't wait for Microsoft to fumble, then they'll tear them to pieces. Look at Apple at the moment, people have been waiting for that WWDC for months, Apple has done very little to their lineup and yet the bloggers are crazy in love and making excuses for them, this would never happen with Microsoft.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  6. #6


    Portsmouth Hants
    Posts : 772
    Windows 8.1 Pro with Media Center


    You also have to note that the basic GUI introduced in Windows 95 was so successful that it has persisted until now in Windows versions up to 7, and will continue for the most part - with Windows Explorer unifying the desktop shell, file manager, and control panel functionality into a single fluid and customizable entity, blurring the differences between the individual component programs. Quite rapidly over the next 2 years, Internet Explorer was also closely integrated into Windows 95, and even the Microsoft Office Suite, so that you could almost seamlessly transform your view from the Explorer file manager to the IE Browser to multifunctional documents with Objects that were Linked and Embedded.

    It was truly amazing, considering, as Mystere says, the constraints that small amounts of RAM and disk space put on systems that were partly 16- and partly 32-bit.

    This led to rather cruel (and clever) epithets like:

    "Windows 95 - a 32 bit extension and a graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit operating system originally coded for a 4 bit microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company that does'nt care 1 bit for its users."

    One frustrating thing was that you could manually repair a broken Windows 3.1 system if you had the basic know-how - Windows 95 and successors became less and less accessible to the "mechanic" with more functionality obscured in the registry. You could manually fix a broken Windows 3.1 with sysedit, or if push came to shove, edlin!
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  7. #7


    Posts : 1,353
    Windows 8 Pro/Windows 8 Pro/Windows 7 64 Bit64Bit/Windows XP


    Quote Originally Posted by fafhrd View Post
    You also have to note that the basic GUI introduced in Windows 95 was so successful that it has persisted until now in Windows versions up to 7, and will continue for the most part - with Windows Explorer unifying the desktop shell, file manager, and control panel functionality into a single fluid and customizable entity, blurring the differences between the individual component programs. Quite rapidly over the next 2 years, Internet Explorer was also closely integrated into Windows 95, and even the Microsoft Office Suite, so that you could almost seamlessly transform your view from the Explorer file manager to the IE Browser to multifunctional documents with Objects that were Linked and Embedded.

    It was truly amazing, considering, as Mystere says, the constraints that small amounts of RAM and disk space put on systems that were partly 16- and partly 32-bit.

    This led to rather cruel (and clever) epithets like:

    "Windows 95 - a 32 bit extension and a graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit operating system originally coded for a 4 bit microprossessor, written by a 2 bit company that does'nt care 1 bit for its users."

    One frustrating thing was that you could manually repair a broken Windows 3.1 system if you had the basic know-how - Windows 95 and successors became less and less accessible to the "mechanic" with more functionality obscured in the registry. You could manually fix a broken Windows 3.1 with sysedit, or if push came to shove, edlin!
    Like I said Microsoft has always been the butt of numerous taunts and will no doubt continue to be. I must admit from Windows 95 to now, I hardly notice the difference except for the Metro Interface and a few minor changes, a couple of days and it just doesn't seem all that different. Its really just like moving into a new home, not like learning a new language or something.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  8. #8


    Posts : 5,707
    Windows 8.1 Pro


    Quote Originally Posted by BillWindows View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Coke Robot View Post
    So if someone using DOS, or Windows 3.11, went and used 95, would had it been difficult and frustrating at times?
    I'm absolutely convinced if Microsoft were to give their Operating systems away for free, people would be complaining they weren't being paid to take it. It's always been this way and looks like it will remain so.
    Have a look at any tech site, the bloggers just can't wait for Microsoft to fumble, then they'll tear them to pieces. Look at Apple at the moment, people have been waiting for that WWDC for months, Apple has done very little to their lineup and yet the bloggers are crazy in love and making excuses for them, this would never happen with Microsoft.
    Oh I know! I've been looking in mountain lion and ios 6, literally the only differences I've seen in ios is apple maps and facebook connectivity and being able to text a person back who's call you missed. Basically, copying Microsoft's Windows Phone. It has its own Bing Maps and BUILT IN social networking without the apps. Even more so, you have a missed call, you can look at the caller's profile and from there, you can call them back or text them. If they're one of your contacts, you can do that as well as email them and even write on their facebook wall. Windows Phone does a flat out better job at putting people first than ios.

    And mountain lion, really? It's like apple just discovered Windows 8. Almost everything "new" is a rip from 8, like continuous notifications even when the system is asleep. The only thing different I've seen is active updates, which is cool, but I guess macs need to update more than Windows if that has to be a new feature. Windows 8 just reminds you a bit, installs them, and doesn't nag you about restarting unless if it's a serious security issue.

    What's worse than that is people are gobbling this up! It's absurd! The "new" macbook only two new things about it, a superfluously high resolution screen that many visual formats I've seen don't go to, and a ridiculously high price of 2,000 dollars. That in itself is the reason why Windows ALWAYS wins the battle. Sure, mac users can upgrade for 20 dollars, but you have to pay at least 1,200 dollars before that. Buy a Windows PC for about 5-600 dollars, it can cost between 60-200 dollars. Right now with a new PC, it's 15.

    I don't know, I continue to believe the apple culture is a close copy of communism we have today....
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  9. #9


    Posts : 1,353
    Windows 8 Pro/Windows 8 Pro/Windows 7 64 Bit64Bit/Windows XP


    Yes but people don't like communism, yet they Love Apple. For years they've been saying they wouldn't like anything bigger on their iPhones and yet when the rumours are that they're getting a 4" screen, all of a sudden it's a great size, a weird mob.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  10. #10


    Posts : 5,707
    Windows 8.1 Pro


    Speaking of apple (I'm on a bit of an apple tirade) in retrospect, you could analyze apple's 1984 commercial differently now. Back then, the runner represented apple breaking people free of IBM, but today; that runner can symbolize the Windows PC breaking apple followers free from apple. It's interesting how tables have turned, apple believed that IBM users were controlled by a higher elite with cloned machines that had no soul or spirit or anything they can make their own, only to turn out to produce devices that really have no soul, little spirit and definitely something you can't make your own except for the wallpaper background. mac os is a boring, overdone, bland operating system that makes Windows look vibrant.

    I guess in the end, Windows will always win the battle because of that, it's YOUR personal computer, whether it be a desktop from a manufacturer or one you built, a laptop, slate, AIO, touch AIO, convertible, netbook or an ultrabook.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast
What did people do when Windows 95 came out?
Related Threads
How to Add Contacts to People App in Windows 8 and 8.1 The People app is included by default in Windows 8. It is your address book and your social app all in one. You can add your contacts, see updates on social networks (like Facebook and Twitter), and keep in touch with friends and family on...
Hi, I have recently unlinked my Skype account from my Microsoft account. For the sake of simplicity, let's say my Skype username is "uzername". The People app still shows this account, and when clicking on it, it says that one of the connected accounts is "uzername_6". What is this? My Skype...
Windows 8 People App in Software and Apps
Newbie to Windows 8 here. I've noticed a peculiar behavior with my "People" App, and I was wondering if there was some way to solve it since it looks to be functioning in a way other than originally intended. When I open the app, it doesn't default to the home page. It defaults instead to one...
Source Do any normal people post here? :D A Guy
Brand Spanking Newbie People tile large and set for active LOTs o' contacts listed when I click on tile When I first installed Windows 8, I used my Microsoft account and the People tile was full of userpix. Then I decided that I wanted to keep it simple, i.e. local account only. It...
If These 5 People Who Tried Windows 8 Are Normal, Microsoft Has A Big Problem On Its Hands Source A Guy
The more I read the various forums here and elsewhere and especially the Microsoft Windows 8 ones, I am convinced that there are a whole lot of people out there that think Windows 8 is a programme rather than an operating system. Questions like "I don't like Windows 8 how can I uninstall it?",...
Eight Forums Android App Eight Forums IOS App Follow us on Facebook