Windows 8 and 8.1 Forums


What did people do when Windows 95 came out?

  1. #41


    Posts : 902
    Win8.1 Pro, Desktop Mode


    Quote Originally Posted by Coke Robot View Post
    When 95 rolled out, it wasn't, I'd say, incredibly easy to use right off the bat because it was that new of a UI?
    I never used any manual. I was able to figure most of it out pretty quickly. And what I couldn't figure out there was plenty of various forum users to fill in the blanks. However, right from the start, win95 just seemed right.

    Metro, just seems wrong, on the desktop.

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  2. #42


    Posts : 1,320
    Server 2012 / 8.0


    The information available on a forum does not compare to the complexity of systems administration.
    There were literally thousands of configuration details and troubleshooting tasks that needed to be addressed.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  3. #43


    Hafnarfjörður IS
    Posts : 4,376
    Linux Centos 7, W8.1, W7, W2K3 Server W10


    Quote Originally Posted by Mystere View Post
    Windows 95 was well received. There was some sarcastic comments, like why do you have to click on start to stop it. But, in general, other than the OS/2 people, it was well liked.

    There wasn't anywhere near the installed base as there is now. The average machine had 1-4 MB of memory (yes, that's Megabyte, not Gigabyte) and there was some complaining that Windows 95 really needed 8MB (and 8MB of memory at the time cost about $400).

    There was a lot to like about it, and it was a LOT more stable than Windows 3.11. And you could really multitask.

    Hi there
    It seems the whole of I.T is fraught with "Inconsistences" like pressing the Start button to get to the SHUT DOWN screen.

    For the life of me I can't understand when some I.T colleagues are saying things like "Error occured when program code ENTERED a USER EXIT ??? in normal speak you don't usually ENTER an EXIT ??? ( Or do you just to be obtuse !).

    Then in say Visual basic it's quite common to see things like I = I + 1.

    Now I'm sure no mathematician on this planet (or anywhere else in the Universe for that matter) would possibly agree with that statement.

    However this sort of stuff works so we just let them get on with it.

    Even outside I.T these things happen -- ever been to a Football Stadium where you SIT in the STANDS too. !! or at a BOXING match where THE RING as actually a SQUARE.



    Win 95 WAS fine. W7 IS fine W8 NEEDS mega changes TO BE fine.

    Cheers
    jimbo
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  4. #44


    Posts : 228
    Black Label 7x64


    Well said, Jimbo. I remember the DOS-to-Windows transition much better than the 3-to-95 because the first Windows was so dramatic. To me, Windows 95 was just better, not jolting in any way. Always hated DOS, thought it was archaic. Remember distinctly in March 1991 because we were at a spring training game in Arizona, a friend and I talking to my friend's dad who was asking us if Windows 3 was easy to use. We said - you have to be a total moron to not be able to use Windows.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  5. #45


    Has no one here made themselves familar with linux? Ubuntu maybe? Lol take a look at what linux users have been doing for over six years and now windows comes running like a dope dealer trying to make a sale. Everything that someone has been complaining about the new windows 8 has already been tried and true in linux the metro desktop linux perfected so well that what the I phone and android phones have come to resemble now comes windows playing catchup and they were slow into the transition why because they control the mass market not many. People will know that windows 8 technology has been out for almost a complete decade in linux
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  6. #46


    Posts : 5,707
    Windows 8.1 Pro


    Quote Originally Posted by killericarus View Post
    Has no one here made themselves familar with linux? Ubuntu maybe? Lol take a look at what linux users have been doing for over six years and now windows comes running like a dope dealer trying to make a sale. Everything that someone has been complaining about the new windows 8 has already been tried and true in linux the metro desktop linux perfected so well that what the I phone and android phones have come to resemble now comes windows playing catchup and they were slow into the transition why because they control the mass market not many. People will know that windows 8 technology has been out for almost a complete decade in linux
    I've used Ubuntu 10 and 11. Meh. 10 feels like mac os, which is partly the reason why I wanted to use so I get a feel for how the mac os works. It's basically the same in mac except for bland gray colors with some blue highlights. 11 is a strange beast, it's like Windows 7 clashed with mac clashed with 8. It's weird....

    Speaking of such, what Linux versions act like Windows 8? I kind of want to take a gander at those...
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  7. #47


    Every linux is the same just update your packages and and repositories linux is the most powerful system in the world even on a computer from 6 years ago you can't know half of what linux has to offer by just installing the live cd lol there are literaly weeks and months worth of options available to all who care to see past the immediate ui. What you see when you install any linux distro is possibly only the immediate feel you get because linux has been trying to emulate the out of box experience you get from windows go past that and you will see how bad windows is trying to be like linux the graphics is literaly amazing when it is configured windows has droves of people that can't configure a dam thing past putting there but in the chair in front of their pc. Beyond graphics is the sheer capability that you see windows has taken away from the computer in general . Ie windows 8 and all of its features has been on linux computers since about 06-08 when computers weren't half as powerful as they are now and yet no one knew this unless they've been usin linux for a handfull of years
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  8. #48


    Posts : 1,353
    Windows 8 Pro/Windows 8 Pro/Windows 7 64 Bit64Bit/Windows XP


    Quote Originally Posted by Colonel Travis View Post
    Well said, Jimbo. I remember the DOS-to-Windows transition much better than the 3-to-95 because the first Windows was so dramatic. To me, Windows 95 was just better, not jolting in any way. Always hated DOS, thought it was archaic. Remember distinctly in March 1991 because we were at a spring training game in Arizona, a friend and I talking to my friend's dad who was asking us if Windows 3 was easy to use. We said - you have to be a total moron to not be able to use Windows.
    So Colonel, when you went onto 3.1 how did you connect to the Internet, how did you install a hard drive, how did you add a video card, how did you connect to Bulletin Boards. Sure if you liked clicking on icons, you'd have to be a moron not to be able to do that anything else was terribly hard, I know, I used to repair computers in those days.
    The only way to get Windows running properly was if you knew how to use DOS. Also how did you connect to a network, all the games were DOS. I could go on and on, but I can assure you, if you didnt know DOS, the chances of running Windows 3.1 properly were minimal.
    There also was no way you could build a computer if you didn't know DOS very, very well. I know because I built plenty, out of second hand parts and old HDD's, motherboards and the odd video card that was around in those days. Windows was just sitting on top of DOS, so if you didn't have that right you had no chance of running Windows.
    I can pretty well guarantee that if you didn't know how to use DOS in those days you didn't know how to run a computer. When Windows came out most companies were still running Word Perfect 5.1 and Lotus,Plus various DOS databases so again, nothing to do with Windows.
    Actually Colonel what you said is one of the funniest comments I've read about the transition from DOS to Windows 3.1.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  9. #49


    Posts : 93
    W2K8S R2 STD, W7 ULTIMATE X64


    Hi,

    I'd say the chances of keeping W3.x running without knowing DOS were indeed very slim.
    Yet, compared to any current OS it was still child's play for anyone willing to dig into it. It was quite a bit of fun to play with cache settings, memory management, defrag utilities and so on.
    Basically anything could be tuned to suit your system and your own needs.

    Knowing DOS is always a good start as it gives a pretty good insight of how computers actually work. Makes you wonder how many of the young ones still do nowadays....

    O, since someone asked earlier, W95 and plug and play.
    Ah, the problem with that one was that there were of course still so many legacy (non p&p) cards about and quite often the install logic for the p&p ones was badly written. Especially so in the early years of p&p.
    So you had a bios setting to deactivate the presence of a P&P ready OS so you could manually install cards pretty much the old way. Then you often also had to reserve IRQ or memory adress lines so card a took those and card b could not take any other free yet reserved resources etc.
    Next in line were the manual edits of the registry so you could fix some stuff install routines had mucked up and so on.
    Even then there was no gaurantee for it to work in the long run and if someone pulled a card or replaced one for something else you could quite often start all over again....

    Still, after a while you'd know the tricky hardware and we sure were determined to get it working even with the quite limited resources of those days as you see, there was no such thing as a virtual IRQ or dynamic adressing.
    In those days you had to reboot a machine for just about any change you made to a system. Never rebooted so many machines so many times as back in those days....
    Yep, you had to know your stuff. But when you were good at it everyone was quite impressed.....


    Cheers,
    Last edited by fdegrove; 18 Jun 2012 at 07:47.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  10. #50


    Adelaide
    Posts : 1,338
    Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 (64 bit), Linux Mint 17.1 MATE (64 bit)


    OMG, I loathed trying to fix IRQ clashes.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

Page 5 of 11 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
What did people do when Windows 95 came out?
Related Threads
How to Add Contacts to People App in Windows 8 and 8.1 The People app is included by default in Windows 8. It is your address book and your social app all in one. You can add your contacts, see updates on social networks (like Facebook and Twitter), and keep in touch with friends and family on...
Hi, I have recently unlinked my Skype account from my Microsoft account. For the sake of simplicity, let's say my Skype username is "uzername". The People app still shows this account, and when clicking on it, it says that one of the connected accounts is "uzername_6". What is this? My Skype...
Windows 8 People App in Software and Apps
Newbie to Windows 8 here. I've noticed a peculiar behavior with my "People" App, and I was wondering if there was some way to solve it since it looks to be functioning in a way other than originally intended. When I open the app, it doesn't default to the home page. It defaults instead to one...
Source Do any normal people post here? :D A Guy
Brand Spanking Newbie People tile large and set for active LOTs o' contacts listed when I click on tile When I first installed Windows 8, I used my Microsoft account and the People tile was full of userpix. Then I decided that I wanted to keep it simple, i.e. local account only. It...
If These 5 People Who Tried Windows 8 Are Normal, Microsoft Has A Big Problem On Its Hands Source A Guy
The more I read the various forums here and elsewhere and especially the Microsoft Windows 8 ones, I am convinced that there are a whole lot of people out there that think Windows 8 is a programme rather than an operating system. Questions like "I don't like Windows 8 how can I uninstall it?",...
Eight Forums Android App Eight Forums IOS App Follow us on Facebook