Windows 8 and 8.1 Forums

What did people do when Windows 95 came out?

  1. #31

    Posts : 5,707
    Windows 8.1 Pro

    I wonder though, the start menu was a HUGELY new concept compared to how Windows used to be. It was used to clean up the Desktop and allowed you to find your programs and files so much more easier. How was that taken?

    Also, I was thinking about this today and how Windows 8 seems to correlate to 95. Back then, the start menu was used to find things and organize better. That in turn helped to clear out the Desktop icons from cluttering so much. That later evolved to a better menu that came out in vista and refined in 7. It used to be where you clicked on something from the Desktop and started it because it was easily right there, easy to access. Then, the start menu came along and began to the end to that, where you simply can find something easily, and maybe having some things on the Desktop for easy convenience. Then, at the height of that model with Windows 7, a new Taskbar came along with a refined start menu of vista's. Now, instead of having things on the Desktop or the start menu, it became pinned to the Taskbar. Having things on the Desktop has effectively become something you don't really do anymore. Not only that the start menu, the place where you could start things and find things, has become something of less purpose. The Most Frequently Used list has turned into Sometimes Used list and the All Programs list has become Never Looked At list. The Taskbar killed the start menu.

    That's where Windows 8 comes in. It has the tiled window concept of Windows 1. It has the concept of the start menu of vista. It has the concept of multitasking of 95. It's a mosh of old and new in a different design than ever before.

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  2. #32

    Posts : 454
    Windows 8.1 Pro with Media Center

    Quote Originally Posted by pparks1 View Post
    Be happy with prices today. When i updated my 486SX-25 from 4MB of RAM to 20MB of RAM by adding a 16MB SIMM chip, it was a $300 upgrade.

    And I still have the receipt from the upgrade that I did from my 170MB Connor hard drive to my whopping 730MB Western Digital hard drive for $359...and that was the lowest price I could find then.
    I got that beat.*

    Upgrading my Atari 400 to 32 KB of RAM was a couple hundred bucks as best I remember. Other stuff I still have the receipts for...

    My first hard drive was a 20 MB Seagate, and it cost $299 bare.

    Upgrading my Atari ST with an extra 2 MB of RAM was $575 for 16 chips; the board they went on was another $150.

    The original HP Deskjet cost me $675, and it printed about 1 ppm. That 300 DPI looked good, though!

    I must have been rich back in the day.

    * Now I shall await someone to recount their computer version of the U.S.S. Indianapolis story.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  3. #33

    Hafnarfjörður IS
    Posts : 4,376
    Linux Centos 7, W8.1, W7, W2K3 Server W10

    Hi there
    Win 95

    It appeared on a desks and we "Just used it" !! (Still got it as a VM !!). We didn't have people in those days giving us "3 Weeks of training" etc etc -- we had to find out ourselves -- and even then in those days there was always someone who seemed to figure this stuff out while we were still looking for the ON switch for the PC's !!.

    Was actually quite a good OS for its day and seemed to work on most hardware around at the time. Much Much better than that absolutely HORRENDOUS OS Ms came out with -- WINDOWS NT ( we called it Windows NeanderThal or Windows No Thanks) -- might have been OK for servers but as a desktop it was a total pain to get ANY periphera hardware to work. Windows 95 was reasonably "Plug 'n Play". Windows 98 2nd edition or whatever they called it built on W95 and was also a decent os for the time.

    Considering we only used to have things like "Text based " desktops -- anybody remember the IBM mainframes with the monochrome (green) 3270 terminals (and "big deal 4 colour" 3278's when they came out a year or two later) running that hideous PROFS system for email --totally text based - no attachments then even Windows 3.11 was a relevation and we all used it without any serious problems.

    In fact it just showed how revolutionary Windows actually was -- companies started setting up LANS based on a CONSUMER OS !!! -- we used to have a really hideous DOS NOWELL network but everyone appreciated the Windows 3.11 LAN as soon as we could use it -- decent apps like EXCEL and Word then became tools of choice and Bye Bye Hideous old IBM text based stuff. (We kept TSO around for a little while longer but the office LAN was much more useable --TSO was only needed for some old back office "Clunker like apps") Today nearly everything is server and LAN based. I don't think users would be happy with text based systems any more !!.

    The only surviving office application today from IBM in some sort of use is that absolutely and totally USELESS Lotus Notes system -- everybody I know that has to use this absolutely hates it - especially for email. Ms's office products still rule the roost whatever you might think of Windows. The whole concept is based around 10 zillion and one databases requiring all sorts of totally absurd permissions and probably has the worst search system on the planet. Still also basically "Text driven " too -- really a dinosaur application long past its sell by date..

    Anybody these days would set up Company Intranets for this type of stuff anyway.

    It was quite amazing how robust the early Windows 3.11 Lans were -- I don't think people would even BEGIN to think about trying to set up those sorts of networks even if there was nothing else around !!!.

    IBM killed themseleves when they did all sorts of things with its OS/2 system and had a bust up with MS. OS/2 was actually vastly superior --built as a mult-tasking OS from the start -- but as always corporate greed with the bozos in suits against the "fledgling newcomer with people dressed in Jeans etc - Enter Microsoft -- a tiny company at that time!

    The rest is History.

    Last edited by jimbo45; 16 Jun 2012 at 02:01.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  4. #34

    Portsmouth Hants
    Posts : 772
    Windows 8.1 Pro with Media Center

    I loved OS/2 2.1 - in the demonstrations* at the computing trades fairs - it always worked as it should - no crashes, robust, on 8 MB DRAM Compaq Luggables attached to VGA projectors - then compare the NT demos in the Microsoft theatre next door, with dual 486, 32MB DRAM Compaq SystemPro towers, and the inevitable hangs and crashes when trying to load Microsoft Office, or play a video clip.

    The OS/2 would multitask Windows 3.1 apps, DOS Programs, Native OS/2apps (not a lot of those about) and demonstrate how robust it was by crashing one running app, while everything else still ran.

    NT would bluescreen and spend most of its time rebooting.

    But when you got your free sample OS/2 giveaway home, and tried to install it - insert disk 1, insert disk 2, insert disk 1 again, insert disk 2, 3, 4,... and if you got the CD-ROM Version, it still meant swapping disks - but you had to format and copy them first!

    I know why it did not catch on.

    But it was OS/2 that had the first proper desktop on the x86 platform - You had program Manager or file manager in 3.1, and no proper desktop until Windows 95. Some of the freer IBM spirits produced a "Workplace Shell for Windows", which you could install on windows 3.x to make it look like OS/2 - worked ok too. I have a copy around somewhere, I wonder if I could get it to work in a VM?

    *Blue golf shirts with "IBM" in white, sneakers and and jeans were the uniform for the Big Blue staff at these events.
    Last edited by fafhrd; 16 Jun 2012 at 10:27.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  5. #35

    Posts : 902
    Win8.1 Pro, Desktop Mode

    Quote Originally Posted by Coke Robot View Post

    That's where Windows 8 comes in. It has the tiled window concept of Windows 1. It has the concept of the start menu of vista. It has the concept of multitasking of 95. It's a mosh of old and new in a different design than ever before.
    Er, no, this is not where win8 comes in. That would imply that it is some sort of natural progression, which it is most assuredly, not. Win8 is a cynical attempt to bully ms's way into the tablet market, an attempt by the way that will fail miserably. They will not supplant apple or android.

    Trying to pretend that win8 is some sort of advance is a fool's errand. Ms has shown utter contempt for the billion or so desktop users that have made the company what it is. Win8 will rightly fail on such a massive scale that those who supported it will wish they had never uttered a word in ms's defense.

    Imho, of course.....
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  6. #36

    My 4 megabyte computer couldn't handle it, but I bought a new one with 16 megs of RAM! Would you believe it? 16 megabytes! I would stare in awe at such power! My family was amazed at how it could show videos. VIDEOS! On a computer!

    And the new computer had a modem! We were on America Online because they sent you free floppy disks in the mail to get you started. And it had a CD player! I wondered if CD players would ever catch on, because the floppy drive handled all our download needs.

    The proponents of DOS and OS/2 were pitching fits about how they hated Bill Gates and how it was morally wrong to submit to his authority. Fortunately, the world has survived and is a better place because of him.

    Windows 95! It was fantastic!
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  7. #37

    Posts : 142
    Windows 8 Enterprise 64-bit (7 Ult, Vista & XP in V-Box)

    I went to Windows 95 from DOS 6.22/WfW 3.11 in late 1996 or early 97.

    It transformed my 486 DX4/100 with 16MB RAM and I was finally able to
    enjoy the power the machine had to offer. It never showed its true potential
    under the older OS.

    Getting used to the desktop concept took a while, and for some time I simply
    ran the OS through Windows Explorer, just as I'd run WfW via File Manager.

    The installation from floppies sucked, though.

    **EDIT: - Yes, I did have a CD-ROM drive, but I got the floppy
    version of W95 on sale for a song. (I still have it, actually, but
    most of the disks have long-since failed).**
    Last edited by Kat; 16 Jun 2012 at 12:38.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  8. #38

    Posts : 1,320
    Server 2012 / 8.0

    What did people do when Windows 95 came out?

    I installed it onto this Pentium.

    ...went down to the local book store
    and bought a 600 page systems adminstrators manual
    on how to configure, deploy, and troubleshoot 95.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  9. #39

    Posts : 5,707
    Windows 8.1 Pro

    When 95 rolled out, it wasn't, I'd say, incredibly easy to use right off the bat because it was that new of a UI?
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  10. #40

    Posts : 299
    win 7 home premium 64 bit

    This is becoming a GREAT retrospective thread about "the good ole days" of PC computing. I was too young to remember back when so I hope more stories will be posted here. I am looking forward to it!!!

    5***** thread!
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

Page 4 of 11 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
What did people do when Windows 95 came out?
Related Threads
How to Add Contacts to People App in Windows 8 and 8.1 The People app is included by default in Windows 8. It is your address book and your social app all in one. You can add your contacts, see updates on social networks (like Facebook and Twitter), and keep in touch with friends and family on...
Hi, I have recently unlinked my Skype account from my Microsoft account. For the sake of simplicity, let's say my Skype username is "uzername". The People app still shows this account, and when clicking on it, it says that one of the connected accounts is "uzername_6". What is this? My Skype...
Windows 8 People App in Software and Apps
Newbie to Windows 8 here. I've noticed a peculiar behavior with my "People" App, and I was wondering if there was some way to solve it since it looks to be functioning in a way other than originally intended. When I open the app, it doesn't default to the home page. It defaults instead to one...
Source Do any normal people post here? :D A Guy
Brand Spanking Newbie People tile large and set for active LOTs o' contacts listed when I click on tile When I first installed Windows 8, I used my Microsoft account and the People tile was full of userpix. Then I decided that I wanted to keep it simple, i.e. local account only. It...
If These 5 People Who Tried Windows 8 Are Normal, Microsoft Has A Big Problem On Its Hands Source A Guy
The more I read the various forums here and elsewhere and especially the Microsoft Windows 8 ones, I am convinced that there are a whole lot of people out there that think Windows 8 is a programme rather than an operating system. Questions like "I don't like Windows 8 how can I uninstall it?",...
Eight Forums Android App Eight Forums IOS App Follow us on Facebook