Really? I thought this wasn't actually to do with a 2 image thing allowing for depth but more of a perspective 3D thing (I may be totally wrong, I haven't watched it with one eye closed yet, I'll do that now).

Regardless, I think this is the sort of 3 D that will catch on for PCs, (or at least I hope) because it's backwards compatible and fairly cheap to create (compared to other 3D solutions). The only downside is that it's 1 person only... but that's why it's called a Personal Computer (PC).

Oli

Update: I just watched it with one eye and I could see the 3D but it may be boast because I know what to expect, I can certainly see the difference between the non tracking and the tracking image.

The only real way to find out is for someone with partial site to give it a go and see if it works on them.

severedsolo is right.
Here's a 3d test with one eye:

Find two pens/pencils.
Hold the ends so the nibs are pointing towards eachother.
Close one eye, and try and make the nibs touch.
Weird, eh?
Now try it with 2 eyes. You'll see its a lot easier to interpret your movements in a 3d environment

Originally Posted by Lil' Domii

severedsolo is right.
Here's a 3d test with one eye:

Find two pens/pencils.
Hold the ends so the nibs are pointing towards eachother.
Close one eye, and try and make the nibs touch.
Weird, eh?
Now try it with 2 eyes. You'll see its a lot easier to interpret your movements in a 3d environment

Yeah I know, its rather clever (and confusing, it give me a headache ).

Although it may not look as good with only eye, head tracking 3D doesn't rely on 2 interpreted images of the same thing, it relies on your perspective.

I admit it may not look like true 3D with no depth perception involved but it would certainly looks more adaptive/different with partial site compared to a standard 2 D display.

We really just need someone to test this and see if it works with partial site or not. That will sort this out.

Oli