Windows 8: Is Microsoft flailing?

In Arlo Guthrie’s famous song, Alice’s Restaurant, the defendant is prosecuted with the use of “twenty seven eight-by-ten colour glossy photographs with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back.” That’s how it felt reading Microsoft’s response to user criticisms of Windows 8. In a lengthy and unbelievably technical post, Marina Dukhon, a senior manager, valiantly defended the new Metro user interface against the withering criticism it has received for being a large step backwards in productivity for current Windows users, using a raft of statistics and formulas.

While admitting that current users might be less productive with the new interface, and using an analogy to road construction projects which take years, Dukhon has in effect told current users to “take one for the team,” arguing that eventually, once everyone converts to the new system, and all the developers rebuild their applications for it, everyone will benefit. This arrogantly assumes that everyone is in the same boat as those at Microsoft — addicted for life to Windows and willing to put up with yet more years of change and inconvenience, to get to some future nirvana.

Source

A Guy
 
I love the insipid picture of the Metro. Just about sums up a large number of views on it!
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Windows 8.1
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
    Other Info
    Use several different computers during a day, so specs are irrelevant.
Why does everyone seem to be mad at Microsoft for showing how they came to the conclusion about the new UI? People wanted to know and Microsoft showed them and people fliped out. I just don't get it. They give them everything they wanted and more and because they could not find something else to be mad about they rip into Microsoft. If it was up to these bepople who are mad at Microsoft we be still on Windows 95.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Windows 7 x64
    System Manufacturer/Model
    Asus
    CPU
    Intel Core i7-2600K Sandy Bridge @5.00 GHz
    Motherboard
    ASUS Maximus IV Extreme-Z LGA 1155
    Memory
    2 x Corsair Dominator 2GB DDR3 @1866 (Old DDR3 1600 Sticks, plan to upgrade)
    Graphics Card(s)
    ATI 4850 (I know it's old, plan to upgrade, taking donations)
    Sound Card
    Realtek ALC889
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Sony Bravia KDL-32EX500
    Screen Resolution
    1980x1080P
    Hard Drives
    1 x Corsair Force Series GT CSSD-F60GBGT-BK Windows
    2 x Western Digital Caviar Black Sata III 750GB (Raid 0)Programs
    1 x Western Digital Caviar Black Sata III 1TB - Media
    2 x Western Digital Caviar Black Sata II 640GB (Raid 0) Mac OS X
    PSU
    Corsair Professional Series Gold AX850
    Case
    Corsair 800D
    Cooling
    Corsair H80 High Performance Liquid CPU Cooler
    Keyboard
    HP Wireless Elite Keyboard
    Mouse
    HP Wireless Elite Mouse
    Internet Speed
    DSL, VisionTek Bigfoot Killer 2100 Gaming Network Card and Internaly Installed Linksys WUSB600N
    Other Info
    4 x GELID Solutions FN-TX12-15 120mm Case Fan with Superior Temperature Control
    1 x Corsair 140mm Case Fan
    1 x SilverStone FP55B Aluminum front panel 5.25" to a 3.5" bay converter
    1 x Ultra Card Reader
    1 x Sony Blu-ray Burner BD-5300S-0B
    1 x 2GB Internaly Installed Flash Drive For Mac OS X Boot
    1 x Internal USB 3.0 Header to 2 USB 3.0 Female Adaptor
    1 x ATI TV Wonder™ Digital Cable Tuner
Why does everyone seem to be mad at Microsoft for showing how they came to the conclusion about the new UI? People wanted to know and Microsoft showed them and people fliped out. I just don't get it. They give them everything they wanted and more and because they could not find something else to be mad about they rip into Microsoft. If it was up to these bepople who are mad at Microsoft we be still on Windows 95.

This is not why people are complaining. No one wants to be stuck using old technology. That said, the linked post isn't good criticism. What's wrong having a common OS interface for PCs and devices? Sounds smart if it can be pulled off properly - and that's the key point and that's why people are complaining.

Then there's this from the link:

But in the same post Dukhon provides the jaw-dropping advice that advanced users might need to consider third party launchers if they don’t like the Windows 8 user interface. Having developers and support professionals use a different interface than their users is a recipe for chaos in the Windows community.

Someone explain to me why this is jaw-dropping? Maybe it is, I'm not a developer or IT person. But I use a third party launcher on my Android phone and haven't read about a freakout. It's just the opposite. The principle reason I and millions of others use an Android phone over an iPhone because with an iPhone you're pretty much stuck with what they give you unless you hack into it. Does that same principle not apply to PCs any more in any new context? One of the big problems people (like me) have with 8 - as it stands now - is giving up user control. I don't want Windows to turn into Apple, which makes great stuff, but which is also totalitarian in what it offers.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Black Label 7x64
    CPU
    AMD Phenom II X6 1055t
    Motherboard
    GA-890FXA-UD5
    Memory
    8GB
    Graphics Card(s)
    Radeon HD 6790
    Sound Card
    X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Acer AJ15
    Screen Resolution
    1600x900
    Hard Drives
    Barracuda 7200 SATA 280GB
    WD Caviar Green SATA 500GB
    PSU
    OCZ ModXStream 700W
    Internet Speed
    25 Mbps/25 Mbps
Back
Top