Microsoft faces lonely road with Surface RT tablets

Computerworld - If it wasn't already apparent, next-generation Windows RT tablets are not getting support from any tablet maker other than Microsoft itself.

And for Microsoft, it could be a lonely, long and hard road for future Surface RT tablets, analysts said.
Jack Gold, an analyst at J. Gold Associates, said Microsoft should "abandon Surface RT and simply focus on Surface Pro and Windows 8 tablets, but make them less expensive and upgrade the features to be more competitive."

"With several companies now abandoning the RT platform, I see no momentum in the market to keep it going long term," Gold added.
Microsoft could choose to keep Surface RT alive indefinitely, but that would rob resources and funds from other projects that have a better chance at success, he added.
Microsoft faces lonely road with Surface RT tablets - Computerworld
 
Does anybody know if said companies are just replacing Windows RT with Android and rebadging the devices? Obviously Microsoft can't do that but it may be a way to sell already produced stock for some manufacturers. I'm not sure its even possible but its interesting to think about.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Windows 10 Education 64 Bit
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
    System Manufacturer/Model
    Asus
    CPU
    AMD Phenom II X4 980 Black Edition Deneb 3.7GHz
    Motherboard
    ASUS M4N68T-M V2 µATX Motherboard
    Memory
    8GB 4GBx2 Kingston PC10600 DDR3 1333 Memory
    Graphics Card(s)
    NVIDIA Geforce GT640 2 Gig DDR3 PCIe
    Sound Card
    VIA VT1708s High Definition Audio 8-channel Onboard
    Monitor(s) Displays
    22" LG E2242 1080p and 2 19" I-INC AG191D
    Screen Resolution
    1280x1024 - 1920x1080 - 1280x1024
    Hard Drives
    Crucial MX100 256 GB SSD and 500 GB WD Blue SATA
    PSU
    Thermaltake TR 620
    Case
    Power Up Black ATX Mid-Tower Case
    Cooling
    Stock heatsink fan
    Keyboard
    Logitech Wireless K350 Wave
    Mouse
    Logitech M570 Trackball and T650 TouchPad
    Internet Speed
    80 Mbps Down 30 Mbps Up
    Browser
    Internet Explorer 11
    Antivirus
    Windows Defender
    Other Info
    HP DVD1040e Lightscribe - External USB2
Does anybody know if said companies are just replacing Windows RT with Android and rebadging the devices? Obviously Microsoft can't do that but it may be a way to sell already produced stock for some manufacturers. I'm not sure its even possible but its interesting to think about.

LOL..Interesting hypothesis! No need to waste perfectly good hardware right?
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    PC-DOS v1.0
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
    System Manufacturer/Model
    IBM
    CPU
    Intel 8088, 4.77MHz
    Memory
    16K, 640K max
    Graphics Card(s)
    What's that?
    Sound Card
    Not quite
    Screen Resolution
    80 X 24 text
    Hard Drives
    dual 160KB 5.25-inch disk drives
Does anybody know if said companies are just replacing Windows RT with Android and rebadging the devices? Obviously Microsoft can't do that but it may be a way to sell already produced stock for some manufacturers. I'm not sure its even possible but its interesting to think about.

Um... this would be a nightmare from a software perspective. If they try to put android into these devices that were built for rt, the software would be buggy as hell. Driver support alone would be one of those end-of-the-world scenarios we often see on the sci-fi channel.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    windows 8
Does anybody know if said companies are just replacing Windows RT with Android and rebadging the devices? Obviously Microsoft can't do that but it may be a way to sell already produced stock for some manufacturers. I'm not sure its even possible but its interesting to think about.

LOL..Interesting hypothesis! No need to waste perfectly good hardware right?

I do believe they use the same CPU/APU's that they use in the Android tablets. That's what made me wonder if it might be doable. A lot of the other hardware may be very similar too.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Windows 10 Education 64 Bit
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
    System Manufacturer/Model
    Asus
    CPU
    AMD Phenom II X4 980 Black Edition Deneb 3.7GHz
    Motherboard
    ASUS M4N68T-M V2 µATX Motherboard
    Memory
    8GB 4GBx2 Kingston PC10600 DDR3 1333 Memory
    Graphics Card(s)
    NVIDIA Geforce GT640 2 Gig DDR3 PCIe
    Sound Card
    VIA VT1708s High Definition Audio 8-channel Onboard
    Monitor(s) Displays
    22" LG E2242 1080p and 2 19" I-INC AG191D
    Screen Resolution
    1280x1024 - 1920x1080 - 1280x1024
    Hard Drives
    Crucial MX100 256 GB SSD and 500 GB WD Blue SATA
    PSU
    Thermaltake TR 620
    Case
    Power Up Black ATX Mid-Tower Case
    Cooling
    Stock heatsink fan
    Keyboard
    Logitech Wireless K350 Wave
    Mouse
    Logitech M570 Trackball and T650 TouchPad
    Internet Speed
    80 Mbps Down 30 Mbps Up
    Browser
    Internet Explorer 11
    Antivirus
    Windows Defender
    Other Info
    HP DVD1040e Lightscribe - External USB2
Hi there
Had these things been designed by using a "Meta Compiler" then you could use just about ANY OS you cared to name and the meta compiler would produce the microcode the device needs to run the application -- and it would be platform independent itself.

For instance SAP have a developer language called ABAP and applications developed using this language can run on just about any conceivable piece of hardware without the developers having to change the source code at all -- whether it's Windows NT, IBM main frames or whatever.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ABAP

Cheers
jimbo
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Linux Centos 7, W8.1, W7, W2K3 Server W10
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
    Monitor(s) Displays
    1 X LG 40 inch TV
    Hard Drives
    SSD's * 3 (Samsung 840 series) 250 GB
    2 X 3 TB sata
    5 X 1 TB sata
    Internet Speed
    0.12 GB/s (120Mb/s)
I still fail to see why MS is held to a different standard than everyone else. I think Microsoft completely mishandled Windows RT and Surface RT, but I don't see why MS is the only company not allowed to make a tablet without full PC capabilities. Yes, the main draw of a Microsoft-based tablet is you don't lose certain functionality when moving away from a PC, but if people want a tablet thats a laptop replacement they should get one with Windows 8 on it. They should be allowed to make a tablet that's only a couple steps above useless for people other than those who just want something to play with, like the iPad and most Android and then a separate tablet for people who want to be able to do almost everything they can do on their desktop or laptop.

I do think Microsoft botched RT. Some of it was their own mistakes and some of it was unfair expectations. Initially I figured there would be just one Surface just like there is just one iPad, but now it should be obvious to anyone why two flavors make sense, one the players and one for workers. They botched it by trying to come close to people's expectations. They wanted to do too much with RT. Maybe they never should have developed RT. Maybe they should have had Windows 8 tablet, then for their budget tablet followed the Apple and Google models of putting their phone OS on the tablet. As for Surface itself, I think Microsoft made the mistake of coming out with them too early. They should have just let others come out with Windows 8 and Windows RT tablets and then brought out the Surface. But all in all, all the doom and gloom is unnecessary. All the problems with Surface are fixable, and it's something MS can turn around by more clearly defining what RT devices do and separating them from full Windows devices.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Windows 7/8
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
What different standard..? RT has been an epic fail...even they admitted it! I appreciate your optimism but if they want to compete in an established market, they should have done their homework a bit better...
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    PC-DOS v1.0
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
    System Manufacturer/Model
    IBM
    CPU
    Intel 8088, 4.77MHz
    Memory
    16K, 640K max
    Graphics Card(s)
    What's that?
    Sound Card
    Not quite
    Screen Resolution
    80 X 24 text
    Hard Drives
    dual 160KB 5.25-inch disk drives
Back
Top