Join Date : Aug 2009
Posts : 9,518
WCP / Win.7 Ultimate 64-bit SP1.
Windows 8 Is Windows 6.2
Yes, Windows 8 is actually Windows 6.2, versioning-wise. As I’m sure you remember, Windows 7 is Windows 6.1, and Windows Vista was Windows 6.0.
Don’t be surprised if Microsoft ends up making the successor of Windows 8, Windows 6.3, because most likely, this is the plan.
The Windows OS version increment can be a source of incompatibilities with existing applications, especially if they’re designed to check for upper bound OS version.
System Manufacturer/Model Number LAPTOP. HP Pavilion dv7-4010TX . OS WCP / Win.7 Ultimate 64-bit SP1. CPU Intel i7 -720QM.[1.6GHz Turbo Boost 2.8GHz. 6MB Cache.] Memory 8 DDR 3 RAM. 1066MHZ Graphics Card ATI 1024 MB. DDR3. Radeon HD5650 Monitor(s) Displays 17.3" High Definition Brightview LCD. LED Backlit. Screen Resolution 1600 x 900.
Keyboard Does the keyboardless Laptop exist? Mouse Logitech Anywhere mouse. MX. Case Laptop / notebook. Cooling Of course.Cooler Master 3 fan with various speeds. Hard Drives 640GB Internet Speed Too slow. Other Info Nunya...
Either way, I think this is proper since kernel wise, Win8 does not seem to be much different then Win7 aside from UI changes and some added features here and there. I'm guessing will see Windows NT 7.0 when the change seem very significant like from XP to Vista
I thought it was quite obvious tbh. Although Microsoft's naming scheme is still completely baffling, it's very apparent this is basically Windows Vista refined and worked on. Same as XP was basically 2000 with extras (and to an extent; XP SP2 was 2000+ if you want to count that as a different OS to XP - as technically they could have released it as such.)
Join Date : Jan 2011
Posts : 538
Windows 8, x64, DP8102 - Win7 Ultimate x64, Dual Boot
Originally Posted by IceFire
Oh, yeah. I't practically IDENTICAL to Vista.
I dunno, really?
I would think it's more akin to Win7 with bonuses!
As far as the 6.2 deal, nothing new (look at my User Agent sig).
As the OP link states, it has more to do with program compatibility than anything else.
Perhaps, but there we so many technological changes underneath that I dunno if that'd ring completely true.
Either way, I'd say the NT product evolved a lot more between XP/Vista than it did between Vista/7.
Join Date : Oct 2011
Australia, NSW, Sydney
Posts : 9
Windows 8 64 bit Developer Preview Build 8102 m3
Originally Posted by arkhi
About time somebody pointed that out lol.
Either way, I think this is proper since kernel wise, Win8 does not seem to be much different then Win7 aside from UI changes and some added features here and there. I'm guessing will see Windows NT 7.0 when the change seem very significant like from XP to Vista
System Manufacturer/Model Number Toshiba Satellite L550 OS Windows 8 64 bit Developer Preview Build 8102 m3 CPU Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 @2.10 GHz Memory 4GB Graphics Card ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4500 Series (Engineering Sample) 512mb Dedicated
Join Date : Oct 2011
Australia
Posts : 585
Windows 8 Dev Preview x64
Originally Posted by Kutosotuk
Originally Posted by arkhi
About time somebody pointed that out lol.
Either way, I think this is proper since kernel wise, Win8 does not seem to be much different then Win7 aside from UI changes and some added features here and there. I'm guessing will see Windows NT 7.0 when the change seem very significant like from XP to Vista
it will probably be as bad as vista too :P
Well that depends... They're building off a physical platform this time, rather than an abstract source (the market). They already know what works and they can test out what doesn't, so I have high hopes for the next big increment.