I believe that Microsoft will not move to a 128 bit operating system for some time. What they need to have is a built in visualization software that allows 32 bit applications to run in a 128 bit environment similar to what Apple with the Mac OS X. You can run 64 bit applications in a 32 bit environment. Very nice in my opinion. If you could run at 32 bit program, a 64 bit program, and a 128 bit program side by side without a “XP Mode” installed that would help the move to 128 bit. At that point people will be willing to go over to a 128 bit OS and as in people I mean corporations. Because we all know that corporations are the driving force of Microsoft not individual consumers.
In reality we do not need to go to 128 bit operating system. A faster OS just allows software programs to hide their flaws in their programing and very quickly we are back in the same situation with the need for yet faster computing power. Microsoft should really go after the software programmers (like they should have after the epic fail of Vista which was caused by horrible 3rd party programmers). Many programs suffer performance issues not because of the user’s hardware but sloppy programing.
In concussion, I want to see new tech come out and I can’t wait to get my hands on it but for now we should be going after the software designers and programmers.
System Manufacturer/Model Number Asus OS Windows 7 x64 CPU Intel Core i7-2600K Sandy Bridge @5.00 GHz Motherboard ASUS Maximus IV Extreme-Z LGA 1155 Memory 2 x Corsair Dominator 2GB DDR3 @1866 (Old DDR3 1600 Sticks, plan to upgrade) Graphics Card ATI 4850 (I know it's old, plan to upgrade, taking donations) Sound Card Realtek ALC889 Monitor(s) Displays Sony Bravia KDL-32EX500 Screen Resolution 1980x1080P
Keyboard HP Wireless Elite Keyboard Mouse HP Wireless Elite Mouse PSU Corsair Professional Series Gold AX850 Case Corsair 800D Cooling Corsair H80 High Performance Liquid CPU Cooler Hard Drives 1 x Corsair Force Series GT CSSD-F60GBGT-BK Windows
2 x Western Digital Caviar Black Sata III 750GB (Raid 0)Programs
1 x Western Digital Caviar Black Sata III 1TB - Media
2 x Western Digital Caviar Black Sata II 640GB (Raid 0) Mac OS X Internet Speed DSL, VisionTek Bigfoot Killer 2100 Gaming Network Card and Internaly Installed Linksys WUSB600N Other Info 4 x GELID Solutions FN-TX12-15 120mm Case Fan with Superior Temperature Control
1 x Corsair 140mm Case Fan
1 x SilverStone FP55B Aluminum front panel 5.25" to a 3.5" bay converter
1 x Ultra Card Reader
1 x Sony Blu-ray Burner BD-5300S-0B
1 x 2GB Internaly Installed Flash Drive For Mac OS X Boot
1 x Internal USB 3.0 Header to 2 USB 3.0 Female Adaptor
1 x ATI TV Wonder™ Digital Cable Tuner
I believe that Microsoft will not move to a 128 bit operating system for some time. What they need to have is a built in visualization software that allows 32 bit applications to run in a 128 bit environment similar to what Apple with the Mac OS X. You can run 64 bit applications in a 32 bit environment. Very nice in my opinion. If you could run at 32 bit program, a 64 bit program, and a 128 bit program side by side without a “XP Mode” installed that would help the move to 128 bit. At that point people will be willing to go over to a 128 bit OS and as in people I mean corporations. Because we all know that corporations are the driving force of Microsoft not individual consumers.
In reality we do not need to go to 128 bit operating system. A faster OS just allows software programs to hide their flaws in their programing and very quickly we are back in the same situation with the need for yet faster computing power. Microsoft should really go after the software programmers (like they should have after the epic fail of Vista which was caused by horrible 3rd party programmers). Many programs suffer performance issues not because of the user’s hardware but sloppy programing.
In concussion, I want to see new tech come out and I can’t wait to get my hands on it but for now we should be going after the software designers and programmers.
Actually there has been some talk of implementing the Windows Server hypervisor into the Windows mainstream OSs, like Windows 8. This would allow for a 128 bit cpu and OS to virtualize just the program part without having to actualy virtualise the entire OS, meaning you could run a 32 bit program in an 128 bit OS without having to run virtualization software like Virtual box. This would allow kernell level files to be virtualized, and seemlessly ran, as long as the hypervisor has a 32 bit kernel interface to be used by the required 32 bit program.
System Manufacturer/Model Number Acer Extensa 5420 OS Windows 7 Ultimate X64 CPU AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-58 Memory 3Gb DDR2 Graphics Card ATI Radeon X1200 Sound Card Realtek High Definition Audio
Mouse IBM TrackPoint Other Info Temporary laptop :P
Join Date : Aug 2011
Posts : 617
Windows 8 Consumer Preview x64
That's not going to happen with 8, Windows 8 will be however the very last 32 bit operating system from Microsoft. Windows 9, I'd place my bets there for 128 bit architecture especially considering that 32 bit has been around for over a decade almost and I think the 64 bit has been underutilized these past year up until now, so chances are the 64 bit will be the new 32 bit for Windows 9 and 128 will be the 64 bit replacement. Got it? :happy: By the way, the smiley faces here are awesome!
System Manufacturer/Model Number ASUS OS Windows 8 Consumer Preview x64 CPU AMD Athlon 240 Motherboard M4A78LT-M LE Memory 6 gig DDR3 Graphics Card ATI Radeon HD 3000 Screen Resolution 1440x900
Keyboard Logitech K750 wireless solar powered keyboard Mouse Microsoft Touch Mouse PSU OCZ 500 watt Case rebuilt and redesigned Dell Dimension 4550 case Cooling Arctic Cooler with 3 heatpipes Hard Drives 500 gig Seagate drive
250 gig Western Digital drive Other Info In current transition from Windows 7 technologies to future Windows 8 technologies...
win 8 is possible, win 9 is likely. why 128-bit? even greater stability, security, and i guess access memory. But who is going to have a gazzilion mbs of memory?
I agree with you, though I don't see it becoming widespread for about 5 or 6 years. As to who's going to have a gazzillion mbs of mem, I'm in that computer using age group that agreed with Bill Gates when he said --- Who needs more than 640 K?????. LOL
System Manufacturer/Model Number BIMS (built it myself) OS Windows 7 64 bit Home Edition CPU Core II Duo E8400 @ 3.45 Ghz Motherboard ASUS P5N-D Memory 8 GB Graphics Card Nvidia GTX 580 Sound Card Creative X-Fi Extreme Gamer Monitor(s) Displays Acer X223W Screen Resolution 1680x1050
Keyboard cheapo Microsoft (but it still does the job) Mouse Logitech wireless -fogot the number long ago Case Cooler Master Cooling huge honkin fan/heatsink Hard Drives Cavalry 1TB Internet Speed 25-30Mbps