No one is realizing that Windows RT along with Office 2013 Home and Student takes up, in actuality, roughly 10 gigs. Microsoft's Surface team manager claims that it takes up 12 or so gigs with Windows RT, OFFICE 2013 HOME AND STUDENT , and a "bunch" of apps. There is very little basis to sue if you understand that yes, the Surface RT has 32 gigs of storage for the base model, but it has Windows RT on it and OFFICE 2013 HOME AND STUDENT .
Of which, will only take 10 gigs without apps or user data. Actually, I might have to go recheck that because when I checked it with the Surface RT, this was including user data that the display models have on them to show things off. I don't believe that it actually takes up 16 gigs when Windows RT was built for smaller storage spaces and Office 2013 for RT was as well. It's a little preposterous to sue a company because they're advertising 32 and 64 gig tablets and you don't have the full space on them. This is been the norm for a LONG time now. The only difference I see is that you have less storage and therefore each gig counts, but even still, the lawyer in this case should had opened up Computer and checked the available space, and if he was running out of space he should had been a little more intelligent and got a 32 gig flash drive (which by the way isn't a true 32 gigs either) or an external hard drive (which also won't have true gig amounts either) or even a 16, 32, or 64 gig microSD card (which again, won't be true gig size as advertised). The Surface RT has a USB port to take advantage of, as well as a microSD card. If you have a Microsoft account, you have another 7 gigs to use in the cloud.
If I run out of space on my hard drive because I have 500 gigs of film and they don't all fit on my 465 gig hard drive, I'm not going to be a derp and sue Seagate for falsely advertising 500 gig hard drives when they're really not due to how the OS recognizes it versus how Seagate and other storage makers count byte and bit sizes. Are you actually going to sue SanDisk because a 32 gig flash drive isn't a true 32 gig size? NO!
I call this a case of user stupidity. There is little justification considering there are like more than three different options to compensate for storage.