Windows 8 and 8.1 Forums

iobit StartMenu8 v ClassicShell

  1. #11

    I haven't tried Start8 for quite a while. There wouldn't be a positive answer too your question.
    I don't think either is "better", just a difference in the layout. Classic is (IMO) totally customisable, so , without using the other, I am a little sceptical regarding Start8 having more options?
    Speed? When I start from cold, without using any electronic timing mechanism, Classic goes fairly instantly to the desktop, there could be a pause of a fraction of a second, however. transiting between the modern and the legacy desktop, it is, to all intents and purposes, instant.

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  2. #12

    Quote Originally Posted by davehc View Post
    "Also a lot of problems I see in Windows 8, especially with Windows Update, comes from people having a useless menu replacement installed."

    Which problems do you refer to?
    I have been using Classic as a second "legacy" start menu, to back up modern, since the first available release of Windows 8. I have encountered very few windows 8 direct related problems, least of all with classic, for which I have had none?

    I have been using Classic Shell since I installed Win 8 with no issues. Never with Windows update.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  3. #13

    Posts : 120
    Windows 8.1 + StartIsBack + AeroGlass

    If you want your Start menu as it was on Win7, StartIsBack is the best of the bunch. It actually makes windows 8 bearable.

    Review: Help! I’ve got Windows 8 and I miss my Start menu! | Ars Technica
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  4. #14

    StartIsBack looks promising; however, I'm a bit concerned over the fact that it looks like support might be limited to the single person that (most likely) wrote the code. Anyway, good suggestion.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  5. #15

    Startisback is by far the best. Not a copy that looks like a cheap copy but the real thing. Oh, and support here.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  6. #16

    Looks nice in the pictures. I know both that and start8 are small pocket money, but I am happy with the totally free Classic.

    Just tried "Startisback.". Not too different from classic. But I didn't try to customise it and it seemed a little buggy. I totally lost the modern screen in there? uninstalled it again.

    P.S. Later.

    I reinstalled and went for the customisation. Not bad at all.
    Last edited by davehc; 07 Feb 2013 at 06:06.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  7. #17

    Posts : 17
    Windows 8 Pro

    I've tried many also, and Start8 is by far the best, in my opinion.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  8. #18

    Quote Originally Posted by LovingWindows View Post
    Also a lot of problems I see in Windows 8, especially with Windows Update, comes from people having a useless menu replacement installed.
    What problems would these be??

    I've been using Start8 since it first came out and have had absolutely NO problems in Windows 8. Best $5 software purchase I ever made!
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  9. #19

    Posts : 62
    Microsoft Windows

    I made a skin for everyone who is disappointed with the Classic Shell look. With this skin: Introducing WinAero’s exclusive Skin Pack for Classic Shell | Winaero, they get exact looking lovely transparent main menu in Classic Shell too and nice user picture jutting out like original Windows 7 menu. Please if you have time to try it, let me know.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  10. #20

    Posts : 5,357
    7/8/ubuntu/Linux Deepin


    That looks useful.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
iobit StartMenu8 v ClassicShell

Similar Threads
Thread Forum
Not a huge fan of IObit personally... Source A Guy

Eight Forums Android App Eight Forums IOS App Follow us on Facebook