What will happen to eyefinity?

Thornton

New Member
Messages
13
i dont know if anyone if familiar with ATI Radeon Eyefinity cards... to sum it up, the make 3+ monitors actualy act as one monitor, allowing you to play games like MOH or COD where your character/gun is in the middle monitor, and you have perifferal vision allowing you to see whats happening to the sides of your character (fun in knife fights in MOH). but now the windows 8 is being supported primarily by nvidea, and on top of that, the royal interface change... will eyefinity users still get the chance to upgrade. this question is goes for n-videa surround... will its multi monitor capabilitys be supported with the new interface?
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    7
Yes it will.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Vanilla 8 Pro x64
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
    System Manufacturer/Model
    SmartEyeball Custom Systems
    CPU
    Intel 3770K @4.8ghz
    Motherboard
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    Memory
    16GB G.Skill Trident 2666mhz
    Graphics Card(s)
    3x Gigabyte GTX 670 OC WindForce SLI
    Sound Card
    SB X-FI Surround 5.1 PRO USB + ATH-AD900 Headphones
    Monitor(s) Displays
    x3 Dell U2410 / 58" Samsung / "40 Sony
    Screen Resolution
    5760*1200/1920*1200 / 1920*1080
    Hard Drives
    2x Intel 520 240GB * Crucial M4 128GB * 2x Samsung F3 1TB (RAID 0) * 2x WD Caviar Blacks 2TB (RAID 0)
    PSU
    Corsair AX1200
    Case
    Thermaltake Level 10 GT Snow Edition
    Cooling
    Noctua NH-D14
    Keyboard
    Topre Realforce // Ducky Shine MX Black // Filco Ninja TKL
    Mouse
    Razer Imperator + Thermaltake Theron
    Other Info
    Laptop Specs: Clevo Sager P170HM // 17.3 Matte 1920x1200 // i7 2720QM // 8GB 1333mhz // Dedicated GTX 485M // 240GB Intel 520 + 750GB + Blu-Ray // Samsung Story 2TB USB 3.0 // NexStar USB 3.0 enclosure 500GB
It would certainly behoove AMD (ATI) to keep up with what MS is doing or they could lose market share to nVidia so my guess is yes, Eyefinity will support Win 8.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    W10 Pro (desktop), W10 (laptop), W10 Pro (tablet)
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
    System Manufacturer/Model
    Home built i7-8700K, Hp Envy x360 EVO Laptop, MS Surface Pro 7
    CPU
    3.7Ghz Core i7-8700K, 11th Gen Core i7-1165G7 4.7Ghz, 10th Gen Core™ i5-1035G4 1.1Ghz
    Motherboard
    ASUS TUF Z370-Pro Gaming, HP, MS
    Memory
    16G, 8G, 8G
    Graphics Card(s)
    AMD Radeon RX580, Intel Iris X Graphics, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4
    Sound Card
    ATI High Definition Audio (Built-in to mobo)
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Dual Samsung U32J59 32 inch monitors, 13.3" display, 12.3" display
    Screen Resolution
    3840x2160 (Desktop), 1920x1080 (laptop), 2736x1824 Pro 7
    Hard Drives
    500GB ssd boot drive with 2 & 10TB Data (Desktop), 512GB ssd (laptop), 128GB SSD (tablet)
    PSU
    Corsair CX 750M
    Case
    Antec 100
    Cooling
    Coolermaster CM 212+
    Keyboard
    IBM Model M - used continuously since 1986
    Mouse
    Microsoft IntelliMouse
    Internet Speed
    665Mbps/15Mbps down/up
    Browser
    FireFox, MS Edge
    Antivirus
    Defender on all
    Other Info
    Retired in 2015 after working in the tech industry for 41 years. First 10 years as a Technician, the rest as a programmer/software engineer. After 1 year of retirement, I was bored so went back to work as a Robotic Process Automation Consultant. Retired for 3rd (and final) time in 2019.
This is going to sound like a silly question, but what it Nvidia's equivalent of Eyefinity? And will it be native to Windows 8 at all (if anyone knows)?
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Windows 8 Dev Preview x64
    CPU
    i7 950 3.06GHz
    Motherboard
    Asus Rampage III
    Memory
    G Skill 4GB DDR3 2000MHz
    Graphics Card(s)
    Nvidia GTX570 1.25GB DDR5
    PSU
    Antec ATX TruePower 750W
    Case
    Antec Lanboy Air Red
This is going to sound like a silly question, but what it Nvidia's equivalent of Eyefinity? And will it be native to Windows 8 at all (if anyone knows)?
its called nvidea surround, it works verry similar to eyefinity, except it requiers 2 cards. alot of the eyefinity was only put on cards benchmarked well over nvideas stuff, so people talk about how surround is better, but they vs the 2 mid grad nvidea cards to the 1 mid grade ati card, ati loses. however if you setup eyefinity using a 5950 or 5970 or 6950 6970 or 6990 than the single ati card will smoke 2 mid grade nvidea cards. and people dont realize the difference in effects of crossfirex and think its the same as running the 2 nvidea cards and compare them. you cant. they are never properly tested which disapoints me. but to answer your question, its a cheap knock off of eyefinity.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    7
I guess it will be supported :)
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Windows 10.0.10122
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
    System Manufacturer/Model
    My Build - Vorttex Ultimate
    CPU
    Core i7 @ 4500 MHz
    Motherboard
    ASUS Z87-Plus
    Memory
    32GB DDR3 @ 1822 MHz (OC)
    Graphics Card(s)
    Radeon R9 280X 3GB @ 1180 / 6800 MHz
    Sound Card
    7.1 HDA
    Monitor(s) Displays
    LCD LG 22" + CRT LG 17"
    Screen Resolution
    1760 x 1320 / 1280 x 960
    Hard Drives
    1 x 240 GB SSD (System)
    3 x 500 GB HDD (Data/Media)
    1 x 2000 GB e-HDD (Backup)
    PSU
    ThermalTake 1000W PSU
    Case
    Corsair Carbide R300
    Cooling
    Corsair H60 (Push-Pull)
    Keyboard
    Microsoft Wireless Keyboard
    Mouse
    Microsoft Wireless Mouse
    Internet Speed
    60 Mbps (Down) 5 Mbps (Up)
    Browser
    IE, FF, Chrome
    Antivirus
    AVG Internet Security 2015
    Other Info
    Some wired stuff
I guess it will be supported :)
but how is the question. the interface is the part im worried about. the computer would no longer be as siuted for high performance gaming. i dont think the os is prepared for that kind of technolagy. if windows even aknowladges that the tecnolagy exists. i dont belive it can run on ubuntu. and even if it can, how many games can. so this means if they dont leave some room for adjustment and drivers, they are going to turn into a busyness computer only. people with windows 7 wont be able to upgrade. and i wouldnt put it past a few to try and find out later that the drivers might not work.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    7
Oh, thanks for pointing that out for me. I will definitely be getting an ATI with my next rig, then.
It's interesting you should say, though... in what way are SLI and crossfirex different? You seem to be knowledgeable on the topic so I thought I would ask. And perhaps that difference has something to do with the native support for Nvidia over ATI?
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Windows 8 Dev Preview x64
    CPU
    i7 950 3.06GHz
    Motherboard
    Asus Rampage III
    Memory
    G Skill 4GB DDR3 2000MHz
    Graphics Card(s)
    Nvidia GTX570 1.25GB DDR5
    PSU
    Antec ATX TruePower 750W
    Case
    Antec Lanboy Air Red
its called nvidia surround, it works very similar to eyefinity, except it requires 2 cards.

A lot of the eyefinity was only put on cards benchmarked well over nvidas stuff, so people talk about how surround is better,

Are you referring to supposedly nvidia optimized benchmarks?


but they vs the 2 mid grade nvida cards to the 1 mid grade ati card, ati loses
.

That's true of any benchmark / game. It's not a Eyefinity/Surround exclusive issue.

however if you setup eyefinity using a 5950 or 5970 or 6950 6970 or 6990 then the single ati card will smoke 2 mid grade nvida cards
.

Once again, if you have two mid range AMD and two mid range Nvida cards, the performance is the same. Also, 2 mid range 560ti's will out perform a single 6970.



and people dont realize the difference in effects of crossfirex and think its the same as running the 2 nvida cards and compare them. you cant. they are never properly tested which disapoints me.

Crossfirex is running two or more GPU's just like Nvidia's SLI - They are properly tested and you can compare them.



but to answer your question, its a cheap knock off of eyefinity.

It's Nvidia's response to Eyefinity. It's not necessarily that cheap a knock off.

The true advantages to Eyefinity is that is arguably more mature and only requires a single card. Aside from that, there isn't a whole lot of difference between the two. Each have their own particular pros and cons.





It's interesting you should say, though... in what way are SLI and crossfirex different? And perhaps that difference has something to do with the native support for Nvidia over ATI?

For the end result, there is no difference between CF and SLI.

CrosfireX and SLI utilize 2 or more GPU's to provide the theoretical performance of one 'big individual' card. (real world performance increase is usually a rough 50%~ )

They aren't 'different' in the sense that both allow you to use extra cards to increase performance.
Previously, SLI was superior but as of the 6xxx series, CF and SLI are virtually identical in terms of performance. Again, both have their own unique issues.


To go crossfire, you still need two or more physical cards, regardless of AMD or Nvidia. The exception are the 'x2' cards; which are a single physical card with 2 GPU's onboard. CF and SLI is 'built in'. ie AMD 6990, nvidia GTX 590


If you are seriously considering Eyefinity, go no lower than a 6950 2GB. Eyefinity sucks on slower cards.

VRAM is also a big factor in multi-screening. The resolutions are huge and the buffer runs out damn quick. 1GB really doesn't cut it - even 1.5 is borderline. 2GB+ is mandatory to avoid lagging.


Just be aware that Eyefinity and Surround aren't perfect and you will have to use a few workarounds.


And I wouldn't worry about native support - support will come from both camps.





PS It's AMD now, not ATI
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Vanilla 8 Pro x64
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
    System Manufacturer/Model
    SmartEyeball Custom Systems
    CPU
    Intel 3770K @4.8ghz
    Motherboard
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    Memory
    16GB G.Skill Trident 2666mhz
    Graphics Card(s)
    3x Gigabyte GTX 670 OC WindForce SLI
    Sound Card
    SB X-FI Surround 5.1 PRO USB + ATH-AD900 Headphones
    Monitor(s) Displays
    x3 Dell U2410 / 58" Samsung / "40 Sony
    Screen Resolution
    5760*1200/1920*1200 / 1920*1080
    Hard Drives
    2x Intel 520 240GB * Crucial M4 128GB * 2x Samsung F3 1TB (RAID 0) * 2x WD Caviar Blacks 2TB (RAID 0)
    PSU
    Corsair AX1200
    Case
    Thermaltake Level 10 GT Snow Edition
    Cooling
    Noctua NH-D14
    Keyboard
    Topre Realforce // Ducky Shine MX Black // Filco Ninja TKL
    Mouse
    Razer Imperator + Thermaltake Theron
    Other Info
    Laptop Specs: Clevo Sager P170HM // 17.3 Matte 1920x1200 // i7 2720QM // 8GB 1333mhz // Dedicated GTX 485M // 240GB Intel 520 + 750GB + Blu-Ray // Samsung Story 2TB USB 3.0 // NexStar USB 3.0 enclosure 500GB
Woah, that was very thorough. I certainly understand it a lot more. Thanks for the awesome post!
What are we looking at in terms of price for the 6950? I might consider building a Windows 8 rig when the time comes. :)
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Windows 8 Dev Preview x64
    CPU
    i7 950 3.06GHz
    Motherboard
    Asus Rampage III
    Memory
    G Skill 4GB DDR3 2000MHz
    Graphics Card(s)
    Nvidia GTX570 1.25GB DDR5
    PSU
    Antec ATX TruePower 750W
    Case
    Antec Lanboy Air Red
Woah, that was very thorough. I certainly understand it a lot more. Thanks for the awesome post!
What are we looking at in terms of price for the 6950? I might consider building a Windows 8 rig when the time comes. :)
sli is literaly doubling your graphics cards. where crossfire x is just increaseing speed (primarily) it will increase SOME video performance. but not like an nvidea sli setup would. idk how many graphics cards you can put togeather with sli, but you can cross fire up to 4 cards possibly more. the point of cross fire is for a smoother feel. sli is ment to completly double your performance. and from what ive seen, it can back fire. if you chose to go with a 6970, youl benchmark just under 2 of nvideas best card with sli, but if you double a crossfire and run the drivers right youl be extremely pleased. if you go with the 6950 youl be i belive right about where nvideas best card is as of now and a little higher on some bench marks and if you cross fire you should have plenty of fun. your performance would be somewhere in between the gpu of a 6950-6970 and your gddr5 ram added up would equal close to the performance of the 6990. but ive never tried a side by side test. this is based of of what they are SUPPOSED to do.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    7
Woah, that was very thorough. I certainly understand it a lot more. Thanks for the awesome post!
What are we looking at in terms of price for the 6950? I might consider building a Windows 8 rig when the time comes. :)

You're welcome.

Price range for a 6950 is $280-$340 depending on retailer / stock or reference cooling.

stock cooling:
(Can't go wrong with Sapphire)
http://www.pccasegear.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=193_1179&products_id=16295

Aftermarket cooling (much quieter and runs cooler)

(Great cooling, very quiet. I have the 580 version. Worth the 3 slots for noise. Very hard to Crossfire however)
ASUS Radeon HD6950 DirectCU II 2GB [EAH6950-DCII-2GD5] - $329.00 : PC Case Gear

(Apparently loud at high fan, but it'd be my 2nd choice for aftermarket cooling)
MSI Radeon HD6950 2GB Twin Frozr III PE/OC [R6950TWINFIIIPEOC] - $339.00 : PC Case Gear

List here:


Think hard and research a lot if thinking of going Eyefinity. It's really one of those 'not for everybody' tech. You may love it and use it all the time, or use it until the novelty wears off. It's an entirely personal thing.

I had a x3 24 setup with my 5970 and apart from the odd 'wow, this really adds to it' game, most of the time it pretty much sucked. Non native games need workarounds, some 'supported' titles were generous with the word support. The biggest killer for me however was performance. My single overclocked 5970 just couldn't cut it. I ended up going back to single screen anyway.

Cards/Eyefinity have improved a little since my 5970 - but the performance hit is still considerable and a reason most people crossfire anyway when running Eyefinity.


Imo, the only major drawback to SLI surround is cost. For a 'top shelf' setup you'd need a pair of 3GB 580's at least. VRAM really is a killer with these mega resolutions.



sli is literaly doubling your graphics cards.

No. It's theoretically doubling performance. Rarely does it actually double the performance.


where crossfire x is just increaseing speed (primarily) it will increase SOME video performance. but not like an nvidea sli setup would.

What? :huh:

Again, crossfire works like SLI.


idk how many graphics cards you can put together with sli, but you can cross fire up to 4 cards possibly more.

The maximum is four for both AMD and Nvida. Drivers do not support more than quad CF/SLI be it four individual or two x2 cards.



the point of cross fire is for a smoother feel. sli is ment to completly double your performance
.

The point of crossfire is exactly the same as SLI. Increase performance with extra GPU's. It has nothing to do with smoothness.

Ironically, game play can often be less smooth due to micro-stutteringthat is inherent in multi-GPU technology. Micro-stutter exists with both CF and SLI. It's impact can vary from barely perceptible to very noticeable hitching. (I didn't realize just how bad micro-stuttering was until I went back to a single GPU).

if you chose to go with a 6970, youl benchmark just under 2 of nvideas best card with sli, but if you double a crossfire and run the drivers right youl be extremely pleased.

Benchmarks are good for a rough guide at best. The majority focus on min/max FPS which isn't the most important aspect. Only a few mention the real important areas such as average, average minimum and how the game actually feels to play.

They also don't cover the fact that CF/SLI is more prone to minimum FPS drops than single GPU's.


I had a 5970 - benchmarks, in-game raw FPS were very high. Very impressive. What the nubers didn't reflect was that real world performance was rubbish. Inconsistent average, a lot more min drops, micro-stutter etc.

Swapped to a single GTX 580 - benchmarks, raw fps are still high, but far from the 5970. Real world performance however is great. Less min drops, higher average, no MS etc. An all round vast improvement over the 5970.

Based on benchmarks alone, the 5970 is a clear winner. Day to day usage though is a completely different story.

Note   Note
BENCHMARKS ARE NOT GOSPEL




your performance would be somewhere in between the gpu of a 6950-6970 and your gddr5 ram added up would equal close to the performance of the 6990.


I'm lost what this could possibly mean. If you are referring to the 6990's 4GB of VRAM and if Crossfiring 2x6950 2GB would give you 4GB useable, then the answer is an emphatic no.

The 6990 is a x2 card, each GPU has it's own 2GB. The VRAM is not accumulative (it doesn't add up) so you still only have 2GB usable. The same applies to separate cards (and SLI as well).


To be honest, I've had trouble following your posts :eek:

I'm not sure if English is your primary language or not. My apologies if it isn't.

Without meaning to be rude, I think you need to do a bit more research on Crossfire and SLI. You're on the right track, but I think your missing a few key fundamentals, or the right terminology which is resulting in you getting the wrong idea about quite a few core aspects to this technology.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Vanilla 8 Pro x64
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
    System Manufacturer/Model
    SmartEyeball Custom Systems
    CPU
    Intel 3770K @4.8ghz
    Motherboard
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    Memory
    16GB G.Skill Trident 2666mhz
    Graphics Card(s)
    3x Gigabyte GTX 670 OC WindForce SLI
    Sound Card
    SB X-FI Surround 5.1 PRO USB + ATH-AD900 Headphones
    Monitor(s) Displays
    x3 Dell U2410 / 58" Samsung / "40 Sony
    Screen Resolution
    5760*1200/1920*1200 / 1920*1080
    Hard Drives
    2x Intel 520 240GB * Crucial M4 128GB * 2x Samsung F3 1TB (RAID 0) * 2x WD Caviar Blacks 2TB (RAID 0)
    PSU
    Corsair AX1200
    Case
    Thermaltake Level 10 GT Snow Edition
    Cooling
    Noctua NH-D14
    Keyboard
    Topre Realforce // Ducky Shine MX Black // Filco Ninja TKL
    Mouse
    Razer Imperator + Thermaltake Theron
    Other Info
    Laptop Specs: Clevo Sager P170HM // 17.3 Matte 1920x1200 // i7 2720QM // 8GB 1333mhz // Dedicated GTX 485M // 240GB Intel 520 + 750GB + Blu-Ray // Samsung Story 2TB USB 3.0 // NexStar USB 3.0 enclosure 500GB
That ASUS looks insane. Thanks for the essay, btw, was a pleasure to read.
Sounds like it might be a 10-12 month wait before we start seeing some proper eyefinity supporting graphics cards (and Nvidia's equivalent).
It'd be fun to use something like this as well, particularly with a scrolling Windows 8 start screen:
alien-curved-monitor.jpg
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Windows 8 Dev Preview x64
    CPU
    i7 950 3.06GHz
    Motherboard
    Asus Rampage III
    Memory
    G Skill 4GB DDR3 2000MHz
    Graphics Card(s)
    Nvidia GTX570 1.25GB DDR5
    PSU
    Antec ATX TruePower 750W
    Case
    Antec Lanboy Air Red
Sorry, didn't mean to write an essay - at least it was readable :)


The cards themselves now are capable, but they are still a niche enthusiast market rather than mainstream. Faster cards will help (eliminating some CF setups), but the biggest hurdle is support from 3rd parties. Multi-screen gaming is even more of a niche market than multi-GPU. As such, not that many titles are being developed with multi-screens in mind.

Not counting matrox adapters, multi-screen gaming like Eyefinity has not been around long at all. In the tech world, it's still an infant.


Monitors like that Alienware are awesome. Unfortunately those type of screens are prototypes :( (At least I've never seen one for sale)


But it would be great to not only use that size screen, but to make it touch capable as well :D
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Vanilla 8 Pro x64
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
    System Manufacturer/Model
    SmartEyeball Custom Systems
    CPU
    Intel 3770K @4.8ghz
    Motherboard
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    Memory
    16GB G.Skill Trident 2666mhz
    Graphics Card(s)
    3x Gigabyte GTX 670 OC WindForce SLI
    Sound Card
    SB X-FI Surround 5.1 PRO USB + ATH-AD900 Headphones
    Monitor(s) Displays
    x3 Dell U2410 / 58" Samsung / "40 Sony
    Screen Resolution
    5760*1200/1920*1200 / 1920*1080
    Hard Drives
    2x Intel 520 240GB * Crucial M4 128GB * 2x Samsung F3 1TB (RAID 0) * 2x WD Caviar Blacks 2TB (RAID 0)
    PSU
    Corsair AX1200
    Case
    Thermaltake Level 10 GT Snow Edition
    Cooling
    Noctua NH-D14
    Keyboard
    Topre Realforce // Ducky Shine MX Black // Filco Ninja TKL
    Mouse
    Razer Imperator + Thermaltake Theron
    Other Info
    Laptop Specs: Clevo Sager P170HM // 17.3 Matte 1920x1200 // i7 2720QM // 8GB 1333mhz // Dedicated GTX 485M // 240GB Intel 520 + 750GB + Blu-Ray // Samsung Story 2TB USB 3.0 // NexStar USB 3.0 enclosure 500GB
But it would be great to not only use that size screen, but to make it touch capable as well :D
Haha, I was more thinking 3D holographic projection (seeing as it is curved), sort of like the 3DS, but better.

It'd be interesting to see if Microsoft will ever develop a gamer centric operating system. That would certainly be a huge incentive for people to purchase it.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Windows 8 Dev Preview x64
    CPU
    i7 950 3.06GHz
    Motherboard
    Asus Rampage III
    Memory
    G Skill 4GB DDR3 2000MHz
    Graphics Card(s)
    Nvidia GTX570 1.25GB DDR5
    PSU
    Antec ATX TruePower 750W
    Case
    Antec Lanboy Air Red
It'd be interesting to see if Microsoft will ever develop a gamer centric operating system. That would certainly be a huge incentive for people to purchase it.

They did. It's called the xbox 360 :p


But I know what you mean - a PC orientated, superfluous services stripped, core version would be fantastic.

Even a 'bootable' option of the existing OS that does the same would be nice. Furthermore, it actually sounds doable.

There are software optimizers that pretend to the same thing, but in reality they are quite useless. But having the OS developers tweak it properly and adjusting the DirectX and other SDK's for game developers to use should unleash the true potential of today's hardware without worrying about conflicts etc.




Modern hardware can handle the added OS overhead as it is, yet even more goodness could be squeezed out of a gamer only orientated config.






Note   Note
Are you listening MS? This is a damn good idea. Add it to the coming features list for future versions. Also, you'll get a feather in your cap for taking the credit of an great idea

 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Vanilla 8 Pro x64
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
    System Manufacturer/Model
    SmartEyeball Custom Systems
    CPU
    Intel 3770K @4.8ghz
    Motherboard
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    Memory
    16GB G.Skill Trident 2666mhz
    Graphics Card(s)
    3x Gigabyte GTX 670 OC WindForce SLI
    Sound Card
    SB X-FI Surround 5.1 PRO USB + ATH-AD900 Headphones
    Monitor(s) Displays
    x3 Dell U2410 / 58" Samsung / "40 Sony
    Screen Resolution
    5760*1200/1920*1200 / 1920*1080
    Hard Drives
    2x Intel 520 240GB * Crucial M4 128GB * 2x Samsung F3 1TB (RAID 0) * 2x WD Caviar Blacks 2TB (RAID 0)
    PSU
    Corsair AX1200
    Case
    Thermaltake Level 10 GT Snow Edition
    Cooling
    Noctua NH-D14
    Keyboard
    Topre Realforce // Ducky Shine MX Black // Filco Ninja TKL
    Mouse
    Razer Imperator + Thermaltake Theron
    Other Info
    Laptop Specs: Clevo Sager P170HM // 17.3 Matte 1920x1200 // i7 2720QM // 8GB 1333mhz // Dedicated GTX 485M // 240GB Intel 520 + 750GB + Blu-Ray // Samsung Story 2TB USB 3.0 // NexStar USB 3.0 enclosure 500GB
Woah, that was very thorough. I certainly understand it a lot more. Thanks for the awesome post!
What are we looking at in terms of price for the 6950? I might consider building a Windows 8 rig when the time comes. :)

You're welcome.

Price range for a 6950 is $280-$340 depending on retailer / stock or reference cooling.

stock cooling:
(Can't go wrong with Sapphire)
Sapphire Radeon HD6950 2GB [SAPH-HD6950] - $279.00 : PC Case Gear

Aftermarket cooling (much quieter and runs cooler)

(Great cooling, very quiet. I have the 580 version. Worth the 3 slots for noise. Very hard to Crossfire however)
ASUS Radeon HD6950 DirectCU II 2GB [EAH6950-DCII-2GD5] - $329.00 : PC Case Gear

(Apparently loud at high fan, but it'd be my 2nd choice for aftermarket cooling)
MSI Radeon HD6950 2GB Twin Frozr III PE/OC [R6950TWINFIIIPEOC] - $339.00 : PC Case Gear

List here:


Think hard and research a lot if thinking of going Eyefinity. It's really one of those 'not for everybody' tech. You may love it and use it all the time, or use it until the novelty wears off. It's an entirely personal thing.

I had a x3 24 setup with my 5970 and apart from the odd 'wow, this really adds to it' game, most of the time it pretty much sucked. Non native games need workarounds, some 'supported' titles were generous with the word support. The biggest killer for me however was performance. My single overclocked 5970 just couldn't cut it. I ended up going back to single screen anyway.

Cards/Eyefinity have improved a little since my 5970 - but the performance hit is still considerable and a reason most people crossfire anyway when running Eyefinity.


Imo, the only major drawback to SLI surround is cost. For a 'top shelf' setup you'd need a pair of 3GB 580's at least. VRAM really is a killer with these mega resolutions.



sli is literaly doubling your graphics cards.

No. It's theoretically doubling performance. Rarely does it actually double the performance.




What? :huh:

Again, crossfire works like SLI.




The maximum is four for both AMD and Nvida. Drivers do not support more than quad CF/SLI be it four individual or two x2 cards.



.

The point of crossfire is exactly the same as SLI. Increase performance with extra GPU's. It has nothing to do with smoothness.

Ironically, game play can often be less smooth due to micro-stutteringthat is inherent in multi-GPU technology. Micro-stutter exists with both CF and SLI. It's impact can vary from barely perceptible to very noticeable hitching. (I didn't realize just how bad micro-stuttering was until I went back to a single GPU).

if you chose to go with a 6970, youl benchmark just under 2 of nvideas best card with sli, but if you double a crossfire and run the drivers right youl be extremely pleased.

Benchmarks are good for a rough guide at best. The majority focus on min/max FPS which isn't the most important aspect. Only a few mention the real important areas such as average, average minimum and how the game actually feels to play.

They also don't cover the fact that CF/SLI is more prone to minimum FPS drops than single GPU's.


I had a 5970 - benchmarks, in-game raw FPS were very high. Very impressive. What the nubers didn't reflect was that real world performance was rubbish. Inconsistent average, a lot more min drops, micro-stutter etc.

Swapped to a single GTX 580 - benchmarks, raw fps are still high, but far from the 5970. Real world performance however is great. Less min drops, higher average, no MS etc. An all round vast improvement over the 5970.

Based on benchmarks alone, the 5970 is a clear winner. Day to day usage though is a completely different story.

Note   Note
BENCHMARKS ARE NOT GOSPEL




your performance would be somewhere in between the gpu of a 6950-6970 and your gddr5 ram added up would equal close to the performance of the 6990.


I'm lost what this could possibly mean. If you are referring to the 6990's 4GB of VRAM and if Crossfiring 2x6950 2GB would give you 4GB useable, then the answer is an emphatic no.

The 6990 is a x2 card, each GPU has it's own 2GB. The VRAM is not accumulative (it doesn't add up) so you still only have 2GB usable. The same applies to separate cards (and SLI as well).


To be honest, I've had trouble following your posts :eek:

I'm not sure if English is your primary language or not. My apologies if it isn't.

Without meaning to be rude, I think you need to do a bit more research on Crossfire and SLI. You're on the right track, but I think your missing a few key fundamentals, or the right terminology which is resulting in you getting the wrong idea about quite a few core aspects to this technology.

depends on whether the benchmark is for a game, or for best graphics performance, or minimum power consumption, or highest framerate. i think you mis understood my statment about ati beating out nvidea. the benchmarks i was looking at was a vary wide scale of different TYPES, almost none of the mench marks where tests of them playing games. the problem with playing a game is that if it is designed for nvidea they may create snippets in the code that say that an nvidea is ALLOWED to do things an ati card might not be able to do in the game so frame rate testing in a game is generaly bad. the best way, but i dont know if anyone does it, would be to create a 3d animation in somthing like blender, set the render type to quad buffer and slowly ramp up the frame rat till the cards cant handel it, or till you see such a drastic resault that it is worth noting. point is. ya, bench marks arent end all be all, but they are much more accurate if you look them up for pin point aspects of the cards. as for the ram, i sayd it would perform, i didnt say it would equal now did i. like i sayed again though at the end of my last post, ive never actualy tested this, most of this is from read other peoples forum posts, posts of my own, and much time spent on toms hardware and the amd and nvidea websites. (although nvidea and ati are boud to sretch the truth a little which is kindof why i try to point out that this all stuff ive READ never TESTED)
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    7
Back
Top